An imaging‐based method of mapping multi‐echo BOLD intracranial pulsatility

Author:

Valsamis Jake J.1ORCID,Luciw Nicholas J.12ORCID,Haq Nandinee1,Atwi Sarah2,Duchesne Simon34,Cameron William5,MacIntosh Bradley J.1267

Affiliation:

1. Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, and Physical Sciences Platform Sunnybrook Research Institute Toronto Ontario Canada

2. Department of Medical Biophysics University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

3. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Université Laval Quebec City Quebec Canada

4. CERVO Brain Research Center Quebec City Quebec Canada

5. Satori Learning AI Toronto Ontario Canada

6. Sandra E Black Centre for Brain Resilience & Recovery Sunnybrook Research Institute Toronto Ontario Canada

7. Computational Radiology & Artificial Intelligence (CRAI) unit, Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway

Abstract

PurposeCardiac‐related intracranial pulsatility may relate to cerebrovascular health, and this information is contained in BOLD MRI data. There is broad interest in methods to isolate BOLD pulsatility, and the current study examines a deep learning approach.MethodsMulti‐echo BOLD images, respiratory, and cardiac recordings were measured in 55 adults. Ground truth BOLD pulsatility maps were calculated with an established method. BOLD fast Fourier transform magnitude images were used as temporal‐frequency image inputs to a U‐Net deep learning model. Model performance was evaluated by mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), structural similarity index (SSIM), and mutual information (MI). Experiments evaluated the influence of input channel size, an age group effect during training, dependence on TE, performance without the U‐Net architecture, and importance of respiratory preprocessing.ResultsThe U‐Net model generated BOLD pulsatility maps with lower MSE as additional fast Fourier transform input images were used. There was no age group effect for MSE (P > 0.14). MAE and SSIM metrics did not vary across TE (P > 0.36), whereas MI showed a significant TE dependence (P < 0.05). The U‐Net versus no U‐Net comparison showed no significant difference for MAE (P = 0.059); however, SSIM and MI were significantly different between models (P < 0.001). Within the insula, the cross‐correlation values were high (r > 0.90) when comparing the U‐Net model trained with/without respiratory preprocessing.ConclusionMulti‐echo BOLD pulsatility maps were synthesized from a U‐net model that was trained to use temporal‐frequency BOLD image inputs. This work adds to the deep learning methods that characterize BOLD physiological signals.

Funder

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Strategic Innovation Fund

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3