Perioperative alpha blockers in voiding dysfunction secondary to prostate biopsy: A meta‐analysis

Author:

Lim Sean1ORCID,Lim Kylie Yen‐Yi2ORCID,Qu Liang1,Ranasinha Sanjeeva3,Dat Anthony1,Brown Matthew4,Manohar Paul1,Harper Matthew1,Donnellan Scott1,Ranasinghe Weranja12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology Monash Health Melbourne Victoria Australia

2. Department of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences Monash University Clayton Victoria Australia

3. Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Monash University Clayton Victoria Australia

4. Department of Urology Fiona Stanley Hospital Murdoch Western Australia Australia

Abstract

AbstractIntroduction and ObjectivesVoiding dysfunction remains a common side effect postprostate biopsy leading to significant morbidity. Alpha blockers have emerged as a potential therapeutic option to mitigate this risk, with various centres already incorporating its use in practice. Despite this, the literature regarding its efficacy remains inconclusive. Hence, a systematic review was performed to quantify the effect of perioperative alpha blockers on prostate biopsy‐related voiding function.MethodsA systematic search in MEDLINE, Embase and PubMed between January 1989 and July 2023 was performed to identify relevant articles. Two independent reviewers independently screened abstracts, full texts and performed data extraction. Data including International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS), voiding flow rates (Qmax), postvoid residuals (PVR), rates of acute urinary retention (AUR) and quality of life (QoL) scores were extracted. Results were combined in an inverse variance random effects meta‐analysis.ResultsA total 808 patients from six randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing alpha blockers to controls were included. All articles excluded patients with pre‐existing voiding dysfunction. Pooled outcomes demonstrated statistically significant differences favouring alpha blocker usage in all objective and subjective measures including IPSS (mean difference 4.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.58–5.84, p < 0.00001), PVR (mean difference 20.41 mL, 95% CI 3.44–37.39, p = 0.02), Qmax (mean difference 3.07 mL/s, 95% CI 2.55–3.59, p < 0.00001), QoL (weighted‐mean difference 0.82, CI 0.17–1.48, p = 0.01) as well as overall risk of AUR (odds ratio 0.22, CI 0.09–0.55, p = 0.001). There was variable heterogeneity (I2 = 0–86%) between outcomes.ConclusionsThis review highlights the potential role of alpha blockers in improving urinary function and reducing adverse voiding outcomes postprostate biopsy. The standard practice of incorporating the usage of perioperative alpha blockers may be considered to reduce the morbidity of voiding complications secondary to prostate biopsy.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3