The effects of public health and social measures (PHSM) implemented during the COVID‐19 pandemic: An overview of systematic reviews

Author:

Fadlallah Racha123ORCID,El‐Jardali Fadi123,Karroum Lama Bou123,Kalach Nour3,Hoteit Reem4ORCID,Aoun Andrew3,Al‐Hakim Lara4,Verdugo‐Paiva Francisca56,Rada Gabriel5,Fretheim Atle78,Lewin Simon7910ORCID,Ludolph Ramona11,Akl Elie A.1412

Affiliation:

1. Center for Systematic Reviews for Health Policy and Systems Research American University of Beirut Beirut Lebanon

2. Department of Health Management and Policy American University of Beirut Beirut Lebanon

3. Knowledge to Policy (K2P) Center American University of Beirut Beirut Lebanon

4. Clinical Research Institute American University of Beirut Beirut Lebanon

5. Epistemonikos Foundation Santiago Chile

6. Orofacial Pain and TMD Program, Facultad de Odontología Universidad Andrés Bello Santiago Chile

7. Centre for Epidemic Interventions Research Norwegian Institute of Public Health Oslo Norway

8. Faculty of Health Sciences Oslo Metropolitan University Oslo Norway

9. Department of Health Sciences Ålesund Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) Trondheim Norway

10. Health Systems Research Unit South African Medical Research Council Cape Town South Africa

11. Department of Epidemic and Pandemic Preparedness and Prevention, WHO Health Emergencies Programme World Health Organization Geneva Switzerland

12. Department of Internal Medicine American University of Beirut Beirut Lebanon

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionTo systematically review the effectiveness and unintended health and socioeconomic consequences of public health and social measures (PHSM) aimed at reducing the scale and risk of transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19).MethodsThis review followed guidance about overviews of reviews in the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions and used the Epistemonikos database's COVID‐19 Living Overview of Evidence repository as a primary search source. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR 2) checklist.ResultsA total of 94 reviews were included, of which eight (9%) had “moderate” to “high” confidence ratings on the AMSTAR 2. Of 16 reviews (17%) reporting applying the GRADE framework, none found high certainty evidence for any of our outcomes of interest. Across the 94 reviews, the most frequently examined PHSM were personal protection (n = 18, 19%). Within multicomponent interventions, so‐called “lockdown” was the most frequently examined component (n = 39, 41%). The most frequently reported outcome category was non‐COVID‐19‐related health outcomes (n = 58, 62%). Only five (5%) reviews reported on socioeconomic outcomes. Findings from the eight reviews with moderate or high confidence ratings on AMSTAR 2 are narratively summarized. There is low‐certainty evidence that multicomponent interventions may reduce the transmission of COVID‐19 in different settings. For active surveillance and response measures, low‐certainty evidence suggests that routine testing of residents and staff in long‐term care facilities may reduce the number of infections, hospitalizations, and deaths among residents. We found very low‐certainty evidence about the effectiveness of personal protection measures, travel‐related control measures, and environmental measures. Unintended consequences were rarely examined by those eight reviews.ConclusionWe found predominantly low‐ to very low‐certainty evidence regarding the effectiveness and unintended consequences of PHSM in controlling the risk and scale of COVID‐19 transmission. There is a need to improve the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference127 articles.

1. WHO.WHO Emergencies Coronavirus Emergency Committee Second Meeting. World Health Organization;2020.

2. A literature review of the economics of COVID‐19

3. COVID-19: Impact on health of people & wealth of nations

4. WHO.Preparedness and Resilience for Emerging Threats. World Health Organization;2023.

5. WHO.Considerations for Implementing and Adjusting Public Health and Social Measures in the Context of COVID‐19. World Health Organization;2023.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3