Comparison between non‐orographic gravity‐wave parameterizations used in QBOi models and Strateole 2 constant‐level balloons

Author:

Lott F.1ORCID,Rani R.1,McLandress C.2,Podglajen A.1,Bushell A.3,Bramberger M.4,Lee H.‐K.5,Alexander J.4,Anstey J.2,Chun H.‐Y.5,Hertzog A.6,Butchart N.3,Kim Y.‐H.7,Kawatani Y.89,Legras B.1,Manzini E.10,Naoe H.11ORCID,Osprey S.12ORCID,Plougonven R.13,Pohlmann H.10,Richter J. H.14ORCID,Scinocca J.2,García‐Serrano J.15,Serva F.16ORCID,Stockdale T.17ORCID,Versick S.18,Watanabe S.8,Yoshida K.11

Affiliation:

1. LMD/IPSL Sorbonne Université, PSL Research Institute, Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris France

2. Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis (CCCma) Victoria British Columbia Canada

3. Met Office Exeter UK

4. NorthWest Research Associates Boulder Office Boulder Colorado USA

5. Yonsei University Seoul South Korea

6. LMD/IPSL Sorbonne Université Paris France

7. Institut für Atmosphäre und Umwelt Goethe‐Universität Frankfurt am Main Germany

8. Japan Agency for Marine‐Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) Yokohama Japan

9. Faculty of Environmental Earth Science Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan

10. Max Planck Institute for Meteorology Hamburg Germany

11. Meteorological Research Institute (MRI) Tsukuba Japan

12. Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics University of Oxford Oxford UK

13. LMD/IPSL Ecole Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris Palaiseau France

14. National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Boulder Colorado USA

15. Group of Meteorology Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain

16. Institute of Marine Sciences National Research Council Rome Italy

17. European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Reading UK

18. Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) Karlsruhe Germany

Abstract

AbstractGravity‐wave (GW) parameterizations from 12 general circulation models (GCMs) participating in the Quasi‐Biennial Oscillation initiative (QBOi) are compared with Strateole 2 balloon observations made in the tropical lower stratosphere from November 2019–February 2020 (phase 1) and from October 2021–January 2022 (phase 2). The parameterizations employ the three standard techniques used in GCMs to represent subgrid‐scale non‐orographic GWs, namely the two globally spectral techniques developed by Warner and McIntyre (1999) and Hines (1997), as well as the “multiwaves” approaches following the work of Lindzen (1981). The input meteorological fields necessary to run the parameterizations offline are extracted from the ERA5 reanalysis and correspond to the meteorological conditions found underneath the balloons. In general, there is fair agreement between amplitudes derived from measurements for waves with periods less than  h and parameterizations. The correlation between the daily observations and the corresponding results of the parameterization can be around 0.4, which is significant, since 1200 days of observations are used. Given that the parameterizations have only been tuned to produce a quasi‐biennial oscillation (QBO) in the models, the 0.4 correlation coefficient of the GW momentum fluxes is surprisingly good. These correlations nevertheless vary between schemes and depend little on their formulation (globally spectral versus multiwaves for instance). We therefore attribute these correlations to dynamical filtering, which all schemes take into account, whereas only a few relate the gravity waves to their sources. Statistically significant correlations are mostly found for eastward‐propagating waves, which may be due to the fact that during both Strateole 2 phases the QBO is easterly at the altitude of the balloon flights. We also found that the probability density functions (pdfs) of the momentum fluxes are represented better in spectral schemes with constant sources than in schemes (“spectral” or “multiwaves”) that relate GWs only to their convective sources.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3