Clinical outcomes after total excision of transobturator tape inserted for treatment of stress urinary incontinence

Author:

Abbas Nazish123ORCID,Virdee Tonicka4,Basu Maya123,Iles David12,Kanitkar Surya5,Kearney Rohna123,Khan Hamayun5,Ward Karen12,Reid Fiona123

Affiliation:

1. Warrell Unit, Saint Mary's Hospital Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust Manchester UK

2. Manchester Academic Health Science Centre Manchester UK

3. Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health University of Manchester Manchester UK

4. The School of Medical Sciences University of Manchester Manchester UK

5. Department of Plastic Surgery Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust Manchester UK

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionMidurethral tapes (MUTs) were the most common surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) between 2008 and 2017. Transobturator tapes were introduced as a novel way to insert MUTs. Some women have experienced life‐changing complications, and opt to undergo a total excision of transobturator tape (TETOT). There is a paucity in evidence about the outcomes of TETOT, which is a complex operation. This study aims to report clinical outcomes of all women who underwent TETOT in a specialist mesh center.MethodsAll women between 2017 and 2022 who underwent TETOT in one mesh center were reviewed. Background demographics and preoperative symptoms were recorded retrospectively. Outcome data were collected using patient global impression of improvement (PGI‐I) scales via telephone review and analyzed using SPSS 25.ResultsForty‐five women underwent telephone review in May 2022, on average 27.9 months (range: 3−60) after TETOT. Mean age was 55 and body mass index (BMI): 30; 82% were postmenopausal, 20% were smokers, and 73.3% had recurrent SUI before excision. Indications for excision were infection (4%), vaginal exposure (24%), urethral perforation (9%), and chronic pain not associated with other complications (60%). Two women with recurrent SUI opted for a concomitant fascial sling; both reported a PGI of “very much improved” regarding SUI postoperatively. Only 12 women (26.5%) did not have SUI before excision; of these 9 (75%) reported new SUI postoperatively. Pain improved for 57.8%, but worsened for 24.4%. Although not statistically significant (p = 0.055), more women who underwent TETOT for pain alone reported worsening pain than those with pain with an additional complication (37% vs. 5.55%). Overall, 62.2% women felt “better” after their excision, 17.8% felt “worse.”DiscussionAfter TETOT, 62% of women felt better. Improvement in pain was reported by 58%—those with chronic pain without another complication reported improvement in pain less frequently (48% vs. 72%) and worsening pain more frequently (37% vs. 6%). Existing SUI worsened in 65% of women and 75% developed new SUI. There appears to be discordance between reporting global improvement with worsening of commonly measured clinical outcomes.ConclusionOutcome data are important for counseling women about the risks and benefits of TETOT. Women and clinicians may have different attitudes to the possible benefits of TETOT, as evidenced by women reporting feeling better despite continuing pain or SUI. Conventional outcome measures do not adequately capture all outcomes that are important to patients.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Urology,Neurology (clinical)

Reference27 articles.

1. An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence

2. [Transobturator urethral suspension: mini‐invasive procedure in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women];Delorme E;Prog Urol,2001

3. NHS Digital. Official Statistics: Retrospective review of surgery for Vaginal prolapse and stress urinary incontinence using tape or mesh.2018. Available online:http://digital.nhs.uk/catalogue/PUB30267

4. Mid‐urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women;Ford AA;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2017

5. The Independent Medicines & Medical Devices Safety Review.2018.http://www.immdsreview.org.uk/news.html. Accessed May 21 2019.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3