Outcomes on an inpatient oncology service after the introduction of hospitalist comanagement

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundSmilow Cancer Hospital (SCH) introduced hospitalist comanagement to the inpatient oncology service to address long lengths of stay and oncologist burnout.ObjectiveTo determine the impact of hospitalists on inpatient quality outcomes and oncologist experience.InterventionsHospitalists were introduced to one of two inpatient oncology services at SCH. Patients were assigned to teams equally based on capacity. Outcomes on the oncologist‐led, traditional service (TS) were compared with outcomes on the hospitalist service (HS) 6 months after program implementation.Main Outcomes and MeasuresOutcomes included patient volume, length of stay (LOS), early discharge, discharge time, and 30‐day readmission rate. Mixed linear or Poisson models that accounted for multiple admissions during the study duration were used. Oncologist experience was measured by survey.ResultsDuring the study period, there were 713 discharges, 400 from the HS and 313 from the TS (p = .0003). There was no difference in demographics or severity of illness (SOI) between services. Following adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, cancer type, and discharge disposition, the average LOS was 4.71 on the HS and 5.47 on the TS (p = .01). Adjusted early discharge rate was 6.22% on the HS and 2.06% on the TS (p = .01). Adjusted mean discharge time was 3:45 p.m. on HS and 4:16 p.m. on TS (p = .009). There was no difference in readmission rates. Oncologists reported less stress (p = .001) and a better ability to manage competing responsibilities (p < .0001) while working on the HS.ConclusionsHospitalist comanagement significantly improved LOS, early discharge, time of discharge, and oncologist experience without an increase in 30‐day readmissions.