COVID‐19 Vaccine Uptake, Hesitancy, and Flare in a Large Rheumatology Practice Network

Author:

Holladay Emily E.1ORCID,Mudano Amy S.2,Xie Fenglong2,Stewart Patrick2,Jackson Lesley E.1ORCID,Danila Maria I.3ORCID,Gavigan Kelly4ORCID,Nowell William B.4ORCID,Venkatachalam Shilpa4ORCID,Curtis Jeffrey R.5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham

2. Illumination Health Hoover Alabama

3. University of Alabama at Birmingham and Birmingham Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center Birmingham Alabama

4. Global Healthy Living Foundation Upper Nyack New York

5. University of Alabama at Birmingham and Illumination Health Hoover Alabama

Abstract

ObjectiveThe goal of this study was to ascertain COVID‐19 vaccine uptake, reasons for hesitancy, and self‐reported flare in a large rheumatology practice‐based network.MethodsA tablet‐based survey was deployed by 108 rheumatology practices from December 2021 to December 2022. Patients were asked about COVID‐19 vaccine status and why they might not receive a vaccine or booster. We used descriptive statistics to explore the differences between vaccination status and vaccine and booster hesitancy, comparing patients with and without autoimmune and inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRDs). We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the association between vaccine uptake and AIIRD status and self‐reported flare and AIIRD status. We reported adjusted odds ratios (aORs).ResultsOf the 61,158 patients, 89% reported at least one dose of vaccine; of the vaccinated, 68% reported at least one booster. Vaccinated patients were less likely to have AIIRDs (44% vs 56%). A greater proportion of patients with AIIRDs were vaccine hesitant (14% vs 10%) and booster hesitant (21% vs 16%) compared to patients without AIIRDs. Safety concerns (28%) and side effects (23%) were the main reasons for vaccine hesitancy, whereas a lack of recommendation from the physician was the primary factor for booster hesitancy (23%). Patients with AIIRD did not have increased odds of self‐reported flare or worsening disease compared to patients without with AIIRD (aOR 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94–1.05). Among the patients who were vaccine hesitant and booster hesitant, 12% and 39% later reported receiving a respective dose. Patients with AIIRD were 32% less likely to receive a vaccine (aOR 0.68, 95% CI 0.65–0.72) versus patients without AIIRD.ConclusionSome patients who are vaccine and booster hesitant eventually receive a vaccine dose, and future interventions tailored to patients with AIIRD may be fruitful. image

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Rheumatology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3