Ultrasound‐guided and CT‐guided selective cervical nerve root injection for the treatment of cervical radicular pain: A retrospective clinical study

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo compare the clinical effects and safety of ultrasound (US)‐guided selective cervical nerve root injection (SCNI) and computed tomography (CT)‐guided SCNI for patients with cervical radicular pain (CRP).MethodsForty‐two CT‐guided SCNI procedures (26 eligible patients) and forty‐two US‐guided SCNI procedures (25 eligible patients) performed to treat CRP were identified from the medical record system between October 2017 and July 2021 and enrolled in the study. The numeric rating scale was used to assess pre‐ and postprocedural pain levels, and the neck disability index was used to assess the level of function. All immediate and delayed clinical complications were also recorded. The cost of each procedure and the radiation dose of the CT procedure were documented. The follow‐up data were obtained by telephone calls or outpatient visits.ResultsFive patients in the CT group and one patient in the US group were lost to follow‐up at 1 year. No procedure‐related complications were observed in either group. Significant pain relief and cervical function improvement were achieved after treatment in both the CT‐guided SCNI and US‐guided SCNI groups; however, there were no significant differences between the two groups. The average cost per CT‐guided SCNI procedure was 133.2 USD, which was higher than the cost per US‐guided SCNI procedure (42.2 USD). Meanwhile, the necessary radiation dose per patient in the CT group was 0.36 ± 0.08 mGy.ConclusionsUS‐guided SCNI and CT‐guided SCNI have similar efficacy in treating CRP, but US‐guided SCNI is radiation free and less costly than the CT‐guided procedure.