Comparative analysis of micronucleus induction and DNA damage biomarkers in TK6 and A375 cells using flow cytometry

Abstract

AbstractPreviously, we introduced an alternative adherent A375 cell line for clastogenicity and aneugenicity testing using a high content imaging platform. To further characterize the performance of A375 cells, we investigated the sensitivity and specificity of A375 and TK6 cells by directly comparing micronucleus (MN) induction, cytotoxicity (relative cell counts, viability, and apoptosis), clastogenicity (γH2AX), and aneuploidy markers (pH 3, MPM‐2, and polyploidy) using flow cytometric methods. We evaluated 14 compounds across different mechanisms (non‐genotoxic apoptosis inducers, clastogens, and aneugens with either tubulin binding or aurora kinase inhibiting phenotypes) at 4‐h and 24‐h post treatment. Both aneugens and clastogens tested positive for micronucleus induction in both cell lines. Apoptosis continued to be a confounding factor for flow cytometry‐based micronuclei assessment in TK6 cells as evidenced by positive responses by the three cytotoxicants. Conversely, A375 cells were not affected by apoptosis‐related false positive signals and did not produce a positive response in the in vitro micronucleus assay. Benchmark dose response (BMD) analysis showed that the induction of micronuclei and biomarkers occurred at similar concentrations in both cell lines for clastogens and aneugens. By showing that A375 cells have similar sensitivity to TK6 cells but a greater specificity, these results provide additional support for A375 cells to be used as an alternative adherent cell line for in vitro genetic toxicology assessment.