Affiliation:
1. Institute of Polymer Materials, Faculty of Materials Science and Applied Chemistry Riga Technical University Riga Latvia
2. Institute of Materials and Surface Engineering, Faculty of Materials Science and Applied Chemistry Riga Technical University Riga Latvia
3. Biorefining and Advanced Materials Research Center, Scotland's Rural College (SRUC) Edinburgh UK
Abstract
AbstractModern thermoset composite matrices are primarily prepared from petroleum‐based plastics, while reinforcements commonly consist of non‐renewable and energy‐demanding glass and carbon fibers. Herein, a non‐chemically treated hemp fiber‐reinforced composite was prepared from bio‐based components: hemp nanopaper (NP) and acrylated epoxidized soybean oil (AESO) or acrylated rapeseed oil (ARO). A commercial‐grade AESO was selected as a reference and compared to ARO prepared in a one‐step synthesis. The impregnation process was examined in detail by studying the impact of surface wetting, temperature, and vacuum on the composite structure. ARO has excellent fiber surface wettability, showing initial contact angles between 46.5° and 48.2° on hemp NP. A more than 10‐fold difference in viscosity between AESO and ARO was observed. ARO composite with 50 wt% hemp loading achieved a Young's modulus of 1.3 GPa, a tensile strength of 26 MPa, and a storage modulus of 4.4 GPa (at 20°C). The results are supplemented by scanning electron microscope analysis of composite morphology via liquid nitrogen fracture and tensile failure analysis, that is, fractography. Dielectric spectroscopy analysis shows that composites have the potential to replace epoxy/paper composite insulators.
Funder
Latvian Council of Science
Subject
Materials Chemistry,Polymers and Plastics,General Chemistry,Ceramics and Composites
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献