Affiliation:
1. The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'An Shaanxi China
2. Xi'an Jiaotong University Medical School in Department of Nursing Xi'an China
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundVaccination is an important method for the prevention of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) transmission. There is currently a lack of real‐world clinical data regarding the safety and efficacy of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) vaccines with respect to plaque psoriasis treatment involving tumor necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α) and interleukin‐17A (IL‐17A) inhibitors.MethodsWe longitudinally analyzed 152 patients with plaque psoriasis, 86 of whom received two doses of inactivated COVID‐19 vaccine (either BBIBP‐CorV or CoronaVac). Comparisons were made between patients undergoing treatment with biologics (TNF‐ α inhibitors or IL‐17A inhibitors) or acitretin. Routine blood tests were used to assess safety; the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) and dermatology life quality index (DLQI) were used to assess efficacy.ResultsAfter inactivated COVID‐19 vaccination, biologics retained considerable advantages in terms of improving skin lesions (measured by PASI) and quality of life (measured by DLQI), compared with conventional treatment (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). Routine blood tests and hepatorenal function analyses suggested that inactivated SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccines did not alter the safety of biologics treatment (p > 0.05).ConclusionsInactivated SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccines do not have significant impacts on the safety and efficacy of biologics (TNF‐α inhibitors or IL‐17A inhibitors) in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.
Subject
Immunology,Immunology and Allergy