Affiliation:
1. Department of Urology, University Hospital Geelong Barwon Health Geelong Australia
2. Faculty of Health Deakin University School of Medicine Geelong Australia
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundSacral nerve stimulators (SNSs) are a widely accepted, efficacious surgical option to treat patients who have failed conservative management for overactive bladder, nonobstructive urinary retention, fecal incontinence, or pelvic pain. As with all implanted devices, there are associated risks for surgical site and implant infections. There are currently no clear published data or guidelines regarding treating such infections.AimsWe present a scoping review aiming to examine the existing literature on the treatment approaches of infected SNSs.MethodsA scoping review was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. The search strategy focused on “sacral modulation,” and “infection,” and “explantation,” and conservative management methods such as “antibiotics.” A search was conducted on medical databases, and a grey literature search was performed.ResultsThirty articles were included for data extraction. Articles were published between 2006 and 2022. Outcomes were reported for 7446 patients. Two hundred and seventy‐four infection events were reported, giving an overall 3.7% infection rate. Most infection events were treated with explantation, although there is some discussion on the role of conservative management using oral and intravenous antibiotics in the literature. Articles also discussed considerations for future reimplantation after explantation of SNS.ConclusionsThere are currently no treatment protocols in the literature to help guide whether a patient is suited to conservative or surgical management. There is future scope for developing treatment algorithms to guide clinicians for optimal treatment of infected sacral neuromodulation devices.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献