Preliminary testing of “roadmap to parenthood” decision aid and planning tool for family building after cancer: Results of a single‐arm pilot study

Author:

Benedict Catherine12ORCID,Ford Jennifer S.3,Schapira Lidia2,Davis Alexandra14,Simon Pamela5,Spiegel David12,Diefenbach Michael6

Affiliation:

1. Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California USA

2. Stanford Cancer Institute Stanford California USA

3. Hunter College and The Graduate Center City University of New York (CUNY) New York New York USA

4. Department of Clinical Psychology Palo Alto University Palo Alto California USA

5. Lucile Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford Palo Alto California USA

6. Center for Health Innovation and Outcomes Research Feinstein Institute for Medical Research Northwell Health Manhasset New York USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveMany young adult female cancer survivors need to use reproductive medicine, surrogacy, or adoption to have a child. This study pilot tested Roadmap to Parenthood, a web‐based, self‐guided decision aid and planning tool for family building after cancer (disease agnostic).MethodsA single‐arm pilot study tested feasibility, acceptability, and obtained effect size estimates of the Roadmap tool. Participants, recruited via hospital‐based and social media strategies, completed a baseline survey (T1), accessed the Roadmap tool (website), then completed surveys at one‐ and 3‐months (T2 and T3, respectively). Feasibility and acceptability were evaluated with rates of eligibility, enrollment, and survey completion, and feedback. Pairwise t‐tests and repeated measures ANOVA evaluated usage effects. Effect size estimates were calculated.ResultsParticipants (N = 98) averaged 31 years old (SD = 5.61); 71% were nulliparous. Enrollment rate was 73%, T1‐T2 completion rate was 80%, and 93% accessed the website. From T1‐T2, participants reported improvements in decisional conflict (p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.85), unmet information needs (p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.70), self‐efficacy (p = 0.003; Cohen's d = 0.40), and self‐efficacy for managing negative emotions (p = 0.03; Cohen's d = 0.29); effects were sustained at T3. There was no change in reproductive distress (p = 0.22). By T3, 94% reported increased consideration of preparatory actions and 20%–61% completed such actions.ConclusionsThe Roadmap intervention was feasible to conduct, acceptable to users, and led to improvements in key psychosocial outcomes. Future directions will test intervention efficacy in a randomized controlled trial with a larger sample and over a longer period. A web‐based tool may help women make decisions about family building after cancer and prepare for potential challenges.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Impact of gynecological cancers on women’s mental health;World Journal of Psychiatry;2024-09-19

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3