Association of Three Novel Inflammatory Markers: Lymphocyte to HDL‐C Ratio, High‐Sensitivity C‐Reactive Protein to HDL‐C Ratio and High‐Sensitivity C‐Reactive Protein to Lymphocyte Ratio With Metabolic Syndrome

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjectiveWe aimed to compare the association of three novel inflammatory indicators with metabolic syndrome (MetS) among Mashhad stroke and heart atherosclerotic disorder (MASHAD) cohort participants.MethodsAccording to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria, the cohort participants were divided into the MetS(+) and MetS(−) groups. The lymphocyte to high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL‐C) ratio (LHR), high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein (hs‐CRP) to HDL‐C ratio (HCHR) and hs‐CRP to lymphocyte ratio (HCLR) were calculated and were compared between the groups. Binary logistic regression (LR) analysis was performed to find the association of the indices with the presence of MetS among men and women. Receiver‐operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to establish cut‐off values in predicting MetS for men and women. p‐Values <0.05 were considered as statistically significant.ResultsAmong a total of 8890 participants (5500 MetS(−) and 3390 MetS(+)), LHR, HCHR and HCLR were significantly higher in the MetS(+) group than in MetS(−) group (p < 0.001). In LR analysis, after adjusting for multiple cofounders, LHR remained an independent factor for the presence of MetS among men (OR: 1.254; 95% CI: 1.202–1.308; p < 0.001) and women (OR: 1.393; 95% CI: 1.340–1.448; p < 0.001). HCHR also remained an independent factor for the presence of MetS only in women (OR: 1.058; 95% CI: 1.043–1.073; p < 0.001). ROC curve analysis showed that LHR had the higher AUC for predicting MetS in both men (AUC: 0.627; 95% CI: 0.611–0.643; p < 0.001) and women (AUC: 0.683; 95% CI: 0.670, 0.696; p < 0.001).ConclusionThis suggests that among both genders, the LHR as an inexpensive and easy‐to‐access marker has a better diagnostic performance and could be a promising alternative to the traditional expensive inflammatory markers such as hs‐CRP for the evaluation of inflammation in patients with MetS.