Checklists of methodological issues for review authors to consider when including non-randomized studies in systematic reviews-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Checklists of methodological issues for review authors to consider when including non-randomized studies in systematic reviews

Author:

Wells George A¹²,Shea Beverley³,Higgins Julian PT⁴⁵,Sterne Jonathan⁶,Tugwell Peter²⁷,Reeves Barnaby C⁸

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine; University of Ottawa; Ottawa Canada

2. Department of Medicine; University of Ottawa; Ottawa Canada

3. Community Information and Epidemiological Technologies; Institute of Population Health; Ottawa Canada

4. MRC Biostatistics Unit; Cambridge UK

5. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; University of York; York UK

6. School of Social and Community Medicine; University of Bristol; UK

7. Centre for Global Health; Institute of Population Health; Ottawa Canada

8. Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, School of Clinical Sciences; University of Bristol; UK

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Education

Link

Reference15 articles.

1. Bai A Shulka VK Bak G Wells GA Quality Assessment Tools Project Report 2012

2. Consensus Statement on the Reporting of Trials (CONSORT) http://www.consort-statement.org/

Cited by 106 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献