Video Ocular Counter‐Roll (vOCR): Otolith‐Ocular Function and Compensatory Effect of the Neck Following Vestibular Loss

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveAssessment of recovery following vestibular loss has been limited by the lack of bedside measures in clinical settings. Here, we used the video ocular counter‐roll (vOCR) test to study otolith‐ocular function and compensatory effect of neck proprioception in patients at different stages of vestibular loss.Study DesignCase‐control study.SettingTertiary care center.MethodsFifty‐six subjects were recruited including patients with acute (9 ± 2 days [mean ± standard error of mean]), subacute (61 ± 11 days), and chronic (1009 ± 266 days) unilateral loss of vestibular function, as well as a group of healthy controls. We used a video‐oculography method based on tracking the iris for vOCR measurement. To examine the effect of neck inputs, vOCR was recorded during two simple tilt maneuvers in all subjects while seated: 30° head‐on‐body tilt and 30° head‐and‐body tilt.ResultsThe vOCR responses evolved at different stages following vestibular loss with improvement of the gains in the chronic stage. The deficit was more pronounced when the whole body was tilted (acute: 0.08 ± 0.01, subacute: 0.11 ± 0.01, chronic: 0.13 ± 0.02, healthy control: 0.18 ± 0.01), and the gain of vOCR improved when the head was tilted on the body (acute: 0.11 ± 0.01, subacute: 0.14 ± 0.01, chronic: 0.13 ± 0.02, healthy control: 0.17 ± 0.01). The time course of vOCR response was affected as well with reduced amplitude and slower response in the acute stage of vestibular loss.ConclusionThe vOCR test can be valuable as a clinical marker to measure vestibular recovery and compensatory effect of neck proprioception in patients at different stages following loss of vestibular function.