Evaluation of repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features produced by the fan‐beam kV‐CT on a novel ring gantry‐based PET/CT linear accelerator

Author:

Ketcherside Trevor1,Shi Chengyu1,Chen Quan1,Leung David2,Sundquist Andrew2,Huntzinger Calvin2,Court Laurence E.3,Han Chunhui1,Watkins Tyler1,Ladbury Colton1,Williams Terence M.1,Liu An1

Affiliation:

1. City of Hope National Medical Center Duarte California USA

2. Reflexion Medical Inc. Hayward California USA

3. UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston California USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe RefleXion X1 is a novel radiotherapy delivery system on a ring gantry equipped with fan‐beam kV‐CT and PET imaging subsystems. The day‐to‐day scanning variability of radiomics features must be evaluated before any attempt to utilize radiomics features.PurposeThis study aims to characterize the repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features produced by the RefleXion X1 kV‐CT.Materials and MethodsThe Credence Cartridge Radiomics (CCR) phantom includes six cartridges of varied materials. It was scanned 10 times on the RefleXion X1 kVCT imaging subsystem over a 3‐month period using the two most frequently used scanning protocols (BMS and BMF). Fifty‐five radiomic features were extracted for each ROI on each CT scan and analyzed using LifeX software. The coefficient of variation (COV) was computed to evaluate the repeatability. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) were used to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of the scanned images using 0.9 as the threshold. This process is repeated on a GE PET‐CT scanner using several built‐in protocols as a comparison.ResultsOn average, 87% of the features on both scan protocols on the RefleXion X1 kVCT imaging subsystem can be considered repeatable as they met COV < 10% criteria. On GE PET‐CT, this number is similar at 86%. When we tighten the criteria to COV <5%, the RefleXion X1 kVCT imaging subsystem showed much better repeatability with 81% of features on average whereas GE PET‐CT showed only 73.5% on average. About 91% and 89% of the features with ICC > 0.9 respectively for BMS and BMF protocols on RefleXion X1. On the other hand, the percentage of features with ICC > 0.9 on GE PET‐CT ranges from 67% to 82%. The RefleXion X1 kVCT imaging subsystem showed excellent intra‐scanner reproducibility between the scanning protocols much better than the GE PET CT scanner. For the inter‐scanner reproducibility, the percentage of features with CCC > 0.9 ranged from 49% to 80%. between X1 and GE PET‐CT scanning protocols.ConclusionsClinically useful CT radiomic features produced by the RefleXion X1 kVCT imaging subsystem are reproducible and stable over time, demonstrating its utility as a quantitative imaging platform.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3