Affiliation:
1. Eating Disorders Research Unit Psychiatric Centre Ballerup Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark Copenhagen Denmark
2. Psychiatric Research Unit Region Zealand Mental Health Service Slagelse Denmark
3. Department of Clinical Medicine Faculty of Health University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
4. Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health University College London London UK
5. Department of Psychology University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveOur study aimed to review the outcome measures/assessment instruments used and to assess their heterogeneity/homogeneity in eating disorders (EDs) randomised controlled trials.MethodsAPA PsycInfo, PubMed, and Embase were searched in December 2022 to identify studies published between and inclusive of January 2012 and December 2022. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were: (1) complete articles published in peer‐reviewed scientific journals, which were: (2) randomised trials, (3) in a clinical setting (4) with human subjects, (5) with an ICD or DSM diagnosis of Anorexia Nervosa, Binge Eating Disorder, or Bulimia Nervosa. The selected papers also: (6) used one or more standardised instruments designed to measure one or more psychometric characteristics associated with ED as a primary or secondary outcome, as judged by the authors of this systematic review, and (7) were published in English or Danish.ResultsNinety one articles were included, and a total of 196 outcome measures were collected.DiscussionThe diversity of outcome measures in ED trials hampers result comparability and data integration. We suggest creating a core outcome measure set using the Delphi method, including clinician and patient‐reported ED assessments, along with relevant comorbidity scales.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献