Misuse of tumor marker levels leads to an insufficient International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCCG) risk group assignment and impaired treatment

Author:

Majewski Matthäus1ORCID,Paffenholz Pia2,Ruf Christian1,Che Yue3,Seidel Christoph4,Heinzelbecker Julia5ORCID,Schmelz Hans‐Ulrich6,Matthies Cord7,Albers Peter3,Bokemeyer Carsten4,Heidenreich Axel28,Pichler Martin9ORCID,Nestler Tim26ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology Federal Armed Services Hospital Ulm Ulm Germany

2. Department of Urology University Hospital of Cologne Cologne Germany

3. Department of Urology University Hospital of Duesseldorf Duesseldorf Germany

4. Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Division of Pneumology University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf, University Hospital of Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany

5. Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology University Medical Centre Homburg, Saarland University Hospital of Homburg Homburg Germany

6. Department of Urology Federal Armed Services Hospital Koblenz Koblenz Germany

7. Department of Urology Federal Armed Services Hospital Hamburg Hamburg Germany

8. Department of Urology Medical University Vienna Vienna Austria

9. Division of Oncology Medical University of Graz Austria

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundMetastatic germ cell tumors of the testis (GCTs) are risk‐stratified according to the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) classification system. This risk classification is based on anatomical risk factors as well as tumor marker levels of AFP, HCG, and LDH assessed pre‐chemotherapy after orchiectomy treatment. An incorrect classification is possible when pre‐orchiectomy marker levels are used, possibly resulting in over‐ or undertreatment of patients. The aim was to investigate the potential frequency and clinical relevance of incorrect risk stratification using pre‐orchiectomy tumor marker levels.MethodsA multicenter registry analysis, including patients with metastasized nonseminomatous GCT (NSGCT), was conducted by investigators of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group (GTCSG). Based on the marker levels at different timepoints, IGCCCG risk groups were calculated. The agreement was tested using Cohen's kappa.ResultsA total of 672 of 1910 (35%) patients were diagnosed with metastatic NSGCTs, and 523 (78%) had sufficient data for 224 follow‐up data points. By using pre‐orchiectomy tumor marker levels, 106 patients (20%) would have been incorrectly classified. Seventy‐two patients (14%) were classified into a higher risk category, and 34 patients (7%) were classified into a lower risk category. Cohen's kappa was 0.69 (p < 0.001), showing a strong agreement between the use of both marker timepoints. The treatment of misclassified patients would have resulted in an overtreatment of 72 patients or undertreatment of 34 patients.ConclusionsThe use of pre‐orchiectomy tumor marker levels may lead to an incorrect risk classification and might subsequently lead to under‐ or overtreatment of patients.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cancer Research,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3