Mouse‐cursor trajectories reveal reduced contextual influence on decision conflict during delay discounting in anorexia nervosa

Author:

Bernardoni Fabio1ORCID,King Joseph A.1ORCID,Hellerhoff Inger12ORCID,Schoemann Martin3ORCID,Seidel Maria1ORCID,Geisler Daniel1ORCID,Boehm Ilka1ORCID,Pauligk Sophie1ORCID,Doose Arne1ORCID,Steding Julius1ORCID,Gramatke Katrin2,Roessner Veit4ORCID,Scherbaum Stefan2ORCID,Ehrlich Stefan12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Translational Developmental Neuroscience Section, Division of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden Dresden Germany

2. Eating Disorder Treatment and Research Center, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Faculty of Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden Dresden Germany

3. Department of Psychology Faculty of Natural sciences, TU Dresden Dresden Germany

4. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital C. G. Carus, Technische Universität Dresden Dresden Germany

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThe capacity of individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN) to forgo immediate food rewards in their long‐term pursuit of thinness is thought to reflect elevated self‐control and/or abnormal reward sensitivity. Prior research attempted to capture an increased tendency to delay gratification in AN using delay‐discounting tasks that assess how rapidly the subjective value of rewards decreases as a function of time until receipt. However, significant effects were mostly subtle or absent. Here, we tested whether the process leading to such decisions might be altered in AN.MethodWe recorded mouse‐cursor movement trajectories leading to the final choice in a computerized delay‐discounting task (238 trials) in 55 acutely underweight females with AN and pairwise age‐matched female healthy controls (HC). We tested for group differences in deviations from a direct choice path, a measure of conflict strength in decision making, and whether group moderated the effect of several predictors of conflict strength (e.g., choice difficulty, consistency). We also explored reaction times and changes in trajectory directions (X‐flips).ResultsNo group differences in delay‐discounting parameters or movement trajectories were detected. However, the effect of the aforementioned predictors on deviations (and to a lesser extent reaction times) was reduced in AN.DiscussionThese findings suggest that while delay discounting and conflict strength in decision making are generally unaltered in AN, conflict strength was more stable across different decisions in the disorder. This might enable individuals with AN to pursue (maladaptive) long‐term body‐weight goals, because particularly conflicting choices may not be experienced as such.Public SignificanceThe deviations from a direct path of mouse‐cursor movements during a computerized delay‐discounting task varied less in people with anorexia nervosa. Assuming such deviations measure decision conflict, we speculate that this increased stability might help people with anorexia nervosa achieve their long‐term weight goals, as for them the struggle with the decision to eat high‐calorie meals when hungry will be milder, so they would be more likely to skip them.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3