Intra‐ and Interimage Reliability of Inter‐Rectus Distance Measurements Determined via Ultrasound Imaging by the Same or Different Testers in Women in the Early Postpartum Period

Author:

Jiang Qing1,Gao Ya1,Xia Shuyu2,Gu Yuefan1,Gu Jun1ORCID,Guo Jianfeng1,Feng Guannan3,Deng Qifeng3,Deng Xuedong1

Affiliation:

1. Ultrasound Department The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou Municipal Hospital Suzhou China

2. The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Yangzhou University, Xiangcheng People's Hospital Suzhou China

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou Municipal Hospital Suzhou China

Abstract

ObjectivesNo consensus regarding the optimal position and location for the measurement of the inter‐rectus distance (IRD) via ultrasound (US) has been reached. By investigating the intra‐ and interimage reliability of IRD measurements taken in different positions and at different locations within and between testers, this study provides a theoretical basis for the current situation.MethodsThe IRD was measured via US in 46 women at 42–60 days after delivery at the superior margin of the umbilicus and 3 cm above, 5 cm above and 3 cm below the umbilicus while the women were in the supine, crunch and standing positions. In the interimage test, every participant was tested 2 times by Physician X and 1 time by Physician Y; in the intraimage test, the images collected by Physician X during the first test were saved in the machines, and two measurements were performed by Physician X and one measurement was performed by Physician Y. Paired t tests and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated.ResultsOnly the first IRD measurements by tester X and tester Y at 3 cm below the umbilicus in the crunch position were significantly different (9.56 ± 6.00 versus 11.00 ± 5.55) (P < .05). All the ICCs were greater than .75, and the intratester ICCs were greater than or equal to the corresponding intertester ICCs. The ICCs at 3 cm below the umbilicus were the smallest in the supine and crunch positions and the largest in the standing position due to the increased frequency of IRD values of 0. The ICCs for the crunch position were greatest according to the intraimage test but smallest according to the interimage test. The interimage ICCs between the two testers in the supine position at the superior margin, 3 cm above, 5 cm above, and 3 cm below the umbilicus were .972, .974, .975, and .956, respectively.ConclusionsUltrasound imaging (USI) is a reliable method for measuring the IRD in women in the early postpartum period. The dynamic measurement of the IRD at or above the umbilicus in the supine position by different testers in real time showed the highest reliability.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Diastasis Recti Abdominis;Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine;2024-06-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3