Handgrip strength is a substitutive metric to the GLIM criteria–defined malnutrition and predicts long‐term mortality among hospitalized patients with cirrhosis

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundHospitalized patients with cirrhosis are prone to debilitating health conditions and fluid fluctuations, posing barriers to accurately obtain anthropometric measures and physical examinations as surrogates for muscle mass within the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM). We hypothesize the handgrip strength (HGS) would serve as a substitutive metric, by comparing the diagnostic consistency and prognostic accuracy with computed tomography–demarcated skeletal muscle index (SMI)–defined malnutrition according to the GLIM criteria.MethodsPatients with cirrhosis underwent a two‐step approach involving nutrition risk screening and those fulfilling GLIM consensus were further diagnosed. The evaluation of muscle mass as one constituent contained in the GLIM criteria was conducted by SMI and HGS, respectively. Consistency test, Kaplan‐Meier curve, and multivariate Cox regression were used to assess the performance of GLIM‐SMI and GLIM‐HGS.ResultsAmong 184 hospitalized patients with cirrhosis, 63 (34.2%) and 78 (42.4%) were diagnosed with malnutrition following GLIM‐SMI and GLIM‐HGS criteria, respectively. Considering the GLIM‐SMI a gold standard, GLIM‐HGS had a sensitivity of 87.3% and a specificity of 81.0%. GLIM‐HGS criteria denoted good agreement (κ value = 0.858, P < 0.001) as compared with GLIM‐SMI. Both criteria were independently associated with 1‐year all‐cause mortality, whereas GLIM‐SMI showed slightly higher hazard ratios. Moreover, HGS positively correlated with SMI in the population alongside more pronounced correlation among patients at nutrition risk.ConclusionHGS may serve as a substitutive metric of muscle mass contained in the GLIM criteria to diagnose malnutrition and predict long‐term mortality among patients with cirrhosis.