When enough is enough: Optimising monitoring effort for large‐scale wolf population size estimation in the Italian Alps

Author:

Boiani M. V.1ORCID,Dupont P.2,Bischof R.2ORCID,Milleret C.2ORCID,Friard O.3,Geary M.1,Avanzinelli E.4,von Hardenberg A.5ORCID,Marucco F.3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biological Sciences Conservation Biology Research Group, University of Chester Chester UK

2. Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management Norwegian University of Life Sciences Ås Norway

3. Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology University of Turin Turin Italy

4. Centro Grandi Carnivori, Ente di Gestione Aree Protette Alpi Marittime Valdieri Cuneo Italy

5. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences University of Pavia Pavia Pavia Italy

Abstract

AbstractThe ongoing expansion of wolf (Canis lupus) populations in Europe has led to a growing demand for up‐to‐date abundance estimates. Non‐invasive genetic sampling (NGS) is now widely used to monitor wolves, as it allows individual identification and abundance estimation without physically capturing individuals. However, NGS is resource‐intensive, partly due to the elusive behaviour and wide distribution of wolves, as well as the cost of DNA analyses. Optimisation of sampling strategies is therefore a requirement for the long‐term sustainability of wolf monitoring programs. Using data from the 2020–2021 Italian Alpine wolf monitoring, we investigate how (i) reducing the number of samples genotyped, (ii) reducing the number of transects, and (iii) reducing the number of repetitions of each search transect impacted spatial capture‐recapture population size estimates. Our study revealed that a 25% reduction in the number of transects or, alternatively, a 50% reduction in the maximum number of repetitions yielded abundance estimates comparable to those obtained using the entire dataset. These modifications would result in a 2046 km reduction in total transect length and 19,628 km reduction in total distance searched. Further reducing the number of transects resulted in up to 15% lower and up to 17% less precise abundance estimates. Reducing only the number of genotyped samples led to higher (5%) and less precise (20%) abundance estimates. Randomly subsampling genotyped samples reduced the number of detections per individual, whereas subsampling search transects resulted in a less pronounced decrease in both the total number of detections and individuals detected. Our work shows how it is possible to optimise wolf monitoring by reducing search effort while maintaining the quality of abundance estimates, by adopting a modelling framework that uses a first survey dataset. We further provide general guidelines on how to optimise sampling effort when using spatial capture‐recapture in large‐scale monitoring programmes.

Funder

LIFE programme

Norges Forskningsråd

Publisher

Wiley

Reference50 articles.

1. Adaptive Management

2. Estimating and forecasting spatial population dynamics of apex predators using transnational genetic monitoring

3. Bischof R. Turek D. Milleret C. Ergon T. Dupont P. Dey S. Zhang W. &deValpine P.(2022).nimbleSCR: Spatial capture‐recapture (SCR) methods using ‘nimble’. R package version 0.2.1.https://CRAN.R‐project.org/package=nimbleSCR

4. Environmental DNA for wildlife biology and biodiversity monitoring

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3