Tranexamic acid use in sarcoma surgery patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Giglio Victoria1ORCID,Gazendam Aaron2ORCID,Farrukh Hadia3,Griffin Anthony4,Ferguson Peter245,Wunder Jay245,Tsoi Kim245

Affiliation:

1. School of Medicine University of Limerick Limerick Ireland

2. Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

3. Department of Surgery McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada

4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University Musculoskeletal Oncology Unit, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

5. Department of Surgical Oncology University Health Network Toronto Ontario Canada

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionPerioperative bleeding increases morbidity and mortality in sarcoma patients. Tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic, is widely utilized in non‐sarcoma orthopaedic surgeries, but its adoption in sarcoma surgery is hindered by concerns about thrombotic events.MethodsSearches in Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were performed without date restrictions. Inclusion criteria encompassed sarcoma patients undergoing surgery with TXA intervention. Two authors independently screened studies, resolved conflicts, and assessed biases.ResultsEight studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 2142 patients. TXA administration varied in dose and timing across studies. Meta‐analysis revealed significantly reduced mean blood loss with TXA of −462.5 mL ([95% confidence interval [CI: −596.7, −328.31], p < 0.001) but no difference in transfusion rates (odds ratio [OR] = 0.51 [95% CI: 0.14–1.89]) or venous thromboembolism events (OR = 0.93 [95% CI: 0.40, 2.16]). Study biases were predominantly moderate to high due to retrospective designs and lack of control for confounders. Quality of reporting varied, with limitations identified in outcome reporting and effect size estimation.ConclusionsDespite evidence of reduced blood loss, the absence of prospective studies limits conclusive recommendations on TXA use in sarcoma surgery. Further research is warranted to determine optimal TXA regimens and assess safety concerns regarding thrombotic events in this patient population.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3