Affiliation:
1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Prince of Wales Hospital The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR
2. Fetal Medicine Research Institute, King's College Hospital, London, UK; Department of Women and Children's Health, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London UK
3. CRIFM Prenatal Medical Clinic Osaka Japan
4. Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Nanjing China
5. King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital Bangkok Thailand
6. Showa University Hospital Tokyo Japan
7. Taipei Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Taipei Taiwan
8. Mediscan Chennai India
9. National University Hospital Singapore
10. Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital Bangkok Thailand
11. Maternal Fetal Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital Singapore
Abstract
AbstractObjectivesTo examine the external validity of the new Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) competing risk model for the prediction of small for gestational age (SGA) at 11‐14 weeks of gestation in Asian population.MethodsThis is a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study in 10,120 women with singleton pregnancies undergoing routine assessment at 11‐14 weeks of gestation. We applied the FMF competing risk model for the first‐trimester prediction of SGA combining maternal characteristics and medical history with measurements of mean arterial pressure (MAP), uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA‐PI), and serum placental growth factor (PlGF). We obtained risks for different cut‐offs of birth weight percentile and gestational age at delivery. We examined the predictive performance in terms of discrimination and calibration.ResultsThe predictive performance of the competing risk model for SGA was similar to that reported in the FMF study. Specifically, the combination of maternal factors with MAP, UtA‐PI, and PlGF yielded the best performance for the prediction of preterm SGA <10th percentile (SGA<10th) and preterm SGA <5th percentile (SGA<5th), with the areas under the curves (AUCs) of 0.765 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.720‐0.809) and 0.789 (95%CI, 0.736‐0.841), respectively. Combining maternal factors, MAP, and PlGF yielded the best model for predicting preterm SGA <3rd percentile (SGA<3rd), with an AUC of 0.797 (95%CI, 0.744‐0.850). After excluding preeclampsia (PE) cases, the combination of maternal factors with MAP, UtA‐PI, and PlGF yielded the best performance for the prediction of preterm SGA<10th and SGA<5th, with AUCs of 0.743 (95%CI, 0.691‐0.795) and 0.762 (95%CI, 0.700‐0.824), respectively. However, the best model for predicting preterm SGA<3rd without PE was the combination of maternal factors and PlGF, with an AUC of 0.786 (95%CI, 0.723‐0.849). The FMF competing risk model including maternal factors, MAP, UtA‐PI, PlGF achieved DRs of 42.2%, 47.3%, and 48.1%, at the fixed FPR of 10%, for the prediction of preterm SGA with birth weight <10th, 5th and 3rd percentiles, respectively. The calibration of the new model was satisfactory.ConclusionThe screening performance of the new FMF first trimester competing risk model for SGA in an independent large cohort of Asian women is comparable to that reported in the original FMF study on a mixed European population.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Reproductive Medicine,General Medicine,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献