Emotions in engineering education: A configurative meta‐synthesis systematic review

Author:

Lönngren Johanna1ORCID,Bellocchi Alberto2,Berge Maria1,Bøgelund Pia3,Direito Inês456ORCID,Huff James L.67ORCID,Mohd‐Yusof Khairiyah89,Murzi Homero10,Farahwahidah Abdul Rahman Nor9,Tormey Roland11

Affiliation:

1. Umeå University Umeå Sweden

2. Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Australia

3. Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark

4. University College London London UK

5. University of Aveiro Aveiro Portugal

6. University of Johannesburg Johannesburg South Africa

7. Harding University Searcy Arkansas USA

8. Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana USA

9. University of Technology Malaysia Skudai Malaysia

10. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg Virginia USA

11. École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe study of emotions in engineering education (EEE) has increased in recent years, but this emerging, multidisciplinary body of research is dispersed and not well consolidated. This paper reports on the first systematic review of EEE research and scholarship.PurposeThe review aimed to critically assess how researchers and scholars in engineering education have conceptualized emotions and how those conceptualizations have been used to frame and conduct EEE research and scholarship.Scope/MethodThe systematic review followed the procedures of a configurative meta‐synthesis, mapping emotion theories and concepts, research purposes and methods, and citation patterns in the EEE literature. The review proceeded through five stages: (i) scoping and database searching; (ii) abstract screening, full text sifting, and full text review; (iii) pearling; (iv) scoping review, and (v) in‐depth analysis for the meta‐synthesis review. Two hundred and thirteen publications were included in the final analysis.ResultsThe results show that the EEE literature has not extensively engaged with the wide range of conceptualizations of emotion available in the educational, psychological, and sociological literature. Further, the focus on emotion often seems to have been unintentional and of secondary importance in studies whose primary goals were to study other phenomena.ConclusionsMore research adopting intentional, theorized approaches to emotions will be crucial in further developing the field. To do justice to complex emotional phenomena in teaching and learning, future EEE research will also need to engage a broader range of conceptualizations of emotion and research methods, drawing on diverse disciplinary traditions.

Funder

National Science Foundation

Vetenskapsrådet

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia

Publisher

Wiley

Reference133 articles.

1. The work of educational innovation: Exploring a personalized interdisciplinary design playbook assignment;Adams R.;International Journal of Engineering Education,2020

2. The Cultural Politics of Emotion

3. Achievement appraisals, emotions and socio-cognitive processes: How they interplay in collaborative problem-solving?

4. Creating space for empathy: Perspectives on challenges of teaching design thinking to future engineers;Bairaktarova D.;International Journal of Engineering Education,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3