Review and Development of Best Practices for Toxicity Tests with Dreissenid Mussels

Author:

Waller Diane1ORCID,Pucherelli Sherri2,Barbour Matthew1ORCID,Tank Samantha3,Meulemans Matthew1,Wise Jeremy1,Dahlberg Angelique4,Aldridge David C.5,Claudi Renata6,Cope W. Gregory7,Gillis Patricia L.8,Kashian Donna R.9ORCID,Mayer Denise10,Stockton‐Fiti Kelly11,Wong Wai Hing12

Affiliation:

1. Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center US Geological Survey La Crosse Wisconsin USA

2. Technical Service Center, Environmental Applications and Research Group, Denver Federal Center US Bureau of Reclamation Denver Colorado

3. Great Lakes Commission Ann Arbor Michigan USA

4. Minnesota Aquatic Invasive Species Research Center University of Minnesota St. Paul Minnesota USA

5. Department of Zoology, The David Attenborough Building University of Cambridge Cambridge United Kingdom

6. RNT Consulting Picton Ontario Canada

7. Department of Applied Ecology North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina USA

8. Aquatic Contaminants Research Division, Water Science and Technology Directorate Environment and Climate Change Canada Burlington Ontario Canada

9. Department of Biological Sciences Wayne State University Detroit Michigan USA

10. Research and Collections New York State Museum Albany New York USA

11. KASF Consulting Henderson Nevada USA

12. Division of Wetlands and Waterways, Bureau of Water Resources Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Boston Massachusetts USA

Abstract

AbstractSince their introduction to North America in the 1980s, research to develop effective control tools for invasive mussels (Dreissena polymorpha and D. rostriformis bugensis) has been ongoing across various research institutions using a range of testing methods. Inconsistencies in experimental methods and reporting present challenges for comparing data, repeating experiments, and applying results. The Invasive Mussel Collaborative established the Toxicity Testing Work Group (TTWG) in 2019 to identify “best practices” and guide development of a standard framework for dreissenid mussel toxicity testing protocols. We reviewed the literature related to laboratory‐based dreissenid mussel toxicity tests and determined the degree to which standard guidelines have been used and their applicability to dreissenid mussel testing. We extracted detailed methodology from 99 studies from the peer‐reviewed and gray literature and conducted a separate analysis for studies using presettlement and postsettlement mussels. We identified specific components of methods and approaches that could be refined or standardized for dreissenid mussels. These components included species identification, collection methods, size/age class distinction, maintenance practices, testing criteria, sample size, response measures, reporting parameters, exposure methods, and mortality criteria. We consulted experts in the field of aquatic toxicology and dreissenid mussel biology on our proposed. The final recommendations contained in the present review are based on published standard guidelines, methods reported in the published and gray literature, and the expertise of TTWG members and an external panel. In addition, our review identifies research needs for dreissenid mussel testing including improved methods for early–life stage testing, comparative data on life stages and between dreissenid mussel species, inclusion of a reference toxicant, and additional testing of nontarget species (i.e., other aquatic organisms). Environ Toxicol Chem 2023;42:1649–1666. © 2023 His Majesty the King in Right of Canada. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC. Reproduced with the permission of the Minister of Environment and Climate Change Canada. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Environmental Chemistry

Reference156 articles.

1. A review of the early life history of zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha): comparisons with marine bivalves

2. The recent and rapid spread of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in Great Britain

3. Angarano M.‐B.(2007).Efficacy of selected natural and synthetic novel organic compounds in prevention of zebra mussel(Dreissena polymorpha)macrofouling by byssal attachment inhibition[Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Texas–Arlington.https://rc.library.uta.edu/uta-ir/bitstream/handle/10106/639/umi-uta-1657.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

4. ASTM International. (2022). Standard guide for conducting laboratory toxicity tests with freshwater mussels. InGuide for conducting laboratory toxicity tests with freshwater mussels(ASTM E2455‐22).

5. ASTM International. (2023). Standard guide for conducting acute toxicity tests on test materials with fishes macroinvertebrates and amphibians. InGuide for conducting acute toxicity tests on test materials with fishes macroinvertebrates and amphibians(ASTM E729‐23e1).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3