TikTok as a platform for hysteroscopy information: An analytical video‐based cross‐sectional study to assess quality, reliability, and accuracy

Author:

Vitale Salvatore Giovanni1,Angioni Stefano1,Saponara Stefania1,Sicilia Gilda1,Etrusco Andrea23,D'Alterio Maurizio Nicola4,Cobellis Luigi4,De Franciscis Pasquale4,Riemma Gaetano4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Surgical Sciences University of Cagliari Cagliari Italy

2. Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE) University of Palermo Palermo Italy

3. Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology “Paolo Giaccone” Hospital Palermo Italy

4. Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli” Naples Italy

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo assess the quality, reliability, and level of misinformation in TikTok videos about hysteroscopy.MethodsA cross‐sectional analysis of TikTok videos retrieved using “hysteroscopy” as search term was performed. Patient education materials assessment tool for audio‐visual content (PEMAT A/V), the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), global quality scale (GQS), video information and quality index (VIQI) and misinformation assessment were used.ResultsOf three hundred videos captured, 156 were excluded and 144 were included. Most videos were partially accurate or uninformative (43.8% and 34.7%, respectively). Non‐healthcare providers produced more inaccurate or uninformative videos than healthcare workers (51.1% vs 4.0%; P < 0.001). Compared to content by professionals, content by patients showed increased distrust towards gynecologists (11.7% vs 0%; P = 0.012) and increased incidence of anxiety and concern towards hysteroscopy (25.5% vs 2%; P < 0.001). PEMAT A/V scores for understandability and actionability were low at 42.9% (interquartile range [IQR]: 11.1–70) and 0% (IQR: 0–0), respectively. Understandability (P < 0.001) and actionability (P = 0.001) were higher for professionals' created content relative to patients' videos. Similarly, median mDISCERN score was low (1 [IQR 0–2]), with significantly higher score for healthcare professionals compared to patients (P < 0.001). Overall video quality was also low, with median VIQI and GQS score of 7 (IQR 4–11) and 1 (IQR 1–3), respectively, and significantly higher scores for healthcare workers' captions compared to patients' for both (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively).ConclusionTikTok videos' quality on hysteroscopy seems unsatisfactory and misinformative, with low understandability and actionability scores. Videos recorded by healthcare workers show higher quality and less misinformation than those by patients. Raising the awareness regarding the low quality of medical information on social media is crucial to increase future reliability and trustworthiness.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3