National Improvement of Waiting Times: First Results From the Dutch Head and Neck Audit

Author:

van Oorschot Hanneke Doremiek1ORCID,de Jel Dominique Valérie Clarence2ORCID,Hardillo Jose Angelito1ORCID,Smeele Ludi E.2ORCID,Baatenburg de Jong Robert Jan1ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute Rotterdam The Netherlands

2. Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Amsterdam Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTimely treatment initiation in head and neck cancer (HNC) care is of great importance regarding survival, oncological, functional, and psychological outcomes. Therefore, waiting times are assessed in the Dutch Head and Neck Audit (DHNA). This audit aims to assess and improve the quality of care through feedback and benchmarking. For this study, we examined how waiting times evolved since the start of the DHNA.Study DesignProspective cohort study.SettingNational multicentre study.MethodsThe DHNA was established in 2014 and reached national coverage of all patients treated for primary HNC in 2019. DHNA data on curative patients from 2015 to 2021 was extracted on national (benchmark) and hospital level. We determined 3 measures for waiting time: (1) the care pathway interval (CPI, first visit to start treatment), (2) the time to treatment interval (TTI, biopsy to start treatment), and (3) CPI‐/TTI‐indicators (percentage of patients starting treatment ≤30 days). The Dutch national quality norm for the CPI‐indicator is 80%.ResultsThe benchmark median CPI and TTI improved between 2015 and 2021 from 37 to 26 days and 37 to 33 days, respectively. Correspondingly, the CPI‐ and TTI‐indicators, respectively, increased from 39% to 64% and 35% to 40% in 2015 to 2021. Outcomes for all hospitals improved and dispersion between hospitals declined. Four hospitals exceeded the 80% quality norm in 2021.ConclusionWaiting times improved gradually over time, with 4 hospitals exceeding the quality standard in 2021. On the hospital‐level, process improvement plans have been initiated. Systematic registration, auditing, and feedback of data support the improvement of quality of care.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3