Inosine enhances the efficacy of immune‐checkpoint inhibitors in advanced solid tumors: A randomized, controlled, Phase 2 study

Author:

Zhao Haiqing12ORCID,Zhang Wei1ORCID,Lu Yuting1,Dong Yin1,He Zhihao1,Zhen Hongchao1,Li Qin1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Oncology, Beijing Friendship Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing People's Republic of China

2. Internal Medicine Department People's Hospital of Shen chi County Shanxi People's Republic of China

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate whether inosine enhances the efficacy of immune‐checkpoint inhibitors in human malignant solid tumors.MethodsThis single‐center, prospective, randomized, open‐label study was conducted, from January 2021 to December 2022, in Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, and participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the inosine (trial) or non‐inosine (control) group that received inosine (dosage: 0.2 g, three times/day) + PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitor or only PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitor ± targeted ± chemotherapy, respectively. Efficacy was assessed every 6 weeks (i.e., after every two–three treatment cycles). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR); the secondary endpoints were disease control rate, overall survival (OS), and progression‐free survival (PFS). The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05809336).ResultsAmong the 172 participants with advanced malignant solid tumors, 86 each were assigned to the inosine and non‐inosine groups, wherein the median PFS (95% CI) was 7.00 (5.31–8.69) and 4.40 (3.10–5.70) months, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63; 95% CI 0.44–0.90, p = 0.011), and the ORR was 26.7% and 15.1%, respectively (p = 0.061). In the inosine and non‐inosine groups, the median OS was not reached and was 29.67 (95% CI 17.40–41.94) months, respectively (HR 1.05 [95% CI 0.59–1.84], p = 0.874). Compared with the non‐inosine group, the median PFS and ORR of the inosine group were significantly prolonged and improved in the multiple exploratory subgroup analyses. The safety analysis showed that Grades 3 and 4 adverse reactions occurred in 25 (29%) and 31 (36%) patients in the inosine and non‐inosine groups, respectively, and tended to decrease in the inosine group compared with the non‐inosine group.ConclusionInosine had a tendency to enhance the efficacy of immune‐checkpoint inhibitors and reduced immunotherapy‐related adverse reactions.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3