Individual‐level determinants of COVID‐19 vaccination in pregnant people in East Tennessee

Author:

Ehrlich Samantha F.1,Maples Jill2,Burnette Sara1,Rand Bethany1,Zite Nikki2,Paudel Alissa2,Fortner Kimberly2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Health The University of Tennessee Knoxville Knoxville Tennessee USA

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine University of Tennessee Medical Center Knoxville Tennessee USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) infection during pregnancy increases the risk of severe illness and death. This study describes individual‐level determinants of COVID‐19 vaccination among pregnant people in East Tennessee.MethodsAdvertisements for the online Moms and Vaccines survey were placed in prenatal clinics in Knoxville, Tennessee. Determinants were compared between unvaccinated individuals and those partially or fully vaccinated for COVID‐19.ResultsWave 1 of the Moms and Vaccines study included 99 pregnant people: 21 (21.2%) were unvaccinated and 78 (78.8%) were partially or fully vaccinated. Compared with the unvaccinated individuals, the partially or fully vaccinated patients more often obtained information about COVID‐19 from their prenatal care provider (8 [38.1%] vs. 55 [70.5%], P = 0.006) and indicated higher levels of trust in that information (4 [19.1] vs. 69 [88.5%], P < 0.0001). Misinformation was higher in the unvaccinated group overall, although there was no difference in concern for the severity of COVID‐19 infection during pregnancy by vaccination status (1 [5.0%] of the unvaccinated vs. 16 [20.8%] of the partially or fully vaccinated, P = 0.183).ConclusionStrategies to counter misinformation are of the utmost importance, particularly pregnancy‐ and reproductive health–related misinformation, because of the increased risk of severe disease faced by unvaccinated pregnant individuals.

Funder

University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3