The timing of reproduction is responding plastically, not genetically, to climate change in yellow‐bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventer)
-
Published:2023-12
Issue:12
Volume:13
Page:
-
ISSN:2045-7758
-
Container-title:Ecology and Evolution
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Ecology and Evolution
Author:
St. Lawrence Sophia1ORCID,
Blumstein Daniel T.23ORCID,
Martin Julien G. A.1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Biology University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada
2. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of California Los Angeles California USA
3. The Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory Crested Butte Colorado USA
Abstract
AbstractWith global climates changing rapidly, animals must adapt to new environmental conditions with altered weather and phenology. The key to adapting to these new conditions is adjusting the timing of reproduction to maximize fitness. Using a long‐term dataset on a wild population of yellow‐bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventer) at the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory (RMBL), we investigated how the timing of reproduction changed with changing spring conditions over the past 50 years. Marmots are hibernators with a 4‐month active season. It is thus crucial to reproduce early enough in the season to have time to prepare for hibernation, but not too early, as snow cover prevents access to food. Importantly, climate change in this area has, on average, increased spring temperatures by 5°C and decreased spring snowpack by 50 cm over the past 50 years. We evaluated how female marmots adjust the timing of their reproduction in response to changing conditions and estimated the importance of both microevolution and plasticity in the variation in this timing. We showed that, within a year, the timing of reproduction is not as tightly linked to the date a female emerges from hibernation as previously thought. We reported a positive effect of spring snowpack but not of spring temperature on the timing of reproduction. We found inter‐individual variation in the timing of reproduction, including low heritability, but not in its response to changing spring conditions. There was directional selection for earlier reproduction since it increased the number and proportion of pups surviving their first winter. Taken together, the timing of marmot reproduction might evolve via natural selection; however, plastic changes will also be extremely important. Further, future studies on marmots should not operate under the assumption that females reproduce immediately following their emergence.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
National Geographic Society
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference59 articles.
1. Socioecology of Marmots: Female Reproductive Strategies
2. Marmot Biology
3. Auguie B.(2017).gridExtra: Miscellaneous functions for “Grid” graphics.https://CRAN.R‐project.org/package=gridExtra
4. climwin: An R Toolbox for Climate Window Analysis