The distribution of bushmeat mammals in unflooded forests of the Central Amazon is influenced by poaching proxies

Author:

de Souza Ferreira Neto Gilson1ORCID,Baccaro Fabricio Beggiato2ORCID,Phillips Matthew J.3ORCID,Massara Rodrigo Lima4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Programa de Pós‐Graduação em Ecologia/INPA‐V8 INPA—Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia Manaus Brazil

2. Departamento de Biologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas Universidade Federal do Amazonas Manaus Brazil

3. School of Earth, Environmental and Biological Sciences Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Queensland Australia

4. Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação, Departamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte Brazil

Abstract

AbstractMedium to large rainforest mammals are key conservation flagship groups that offer non‐redundant ecosystem functions, but anthropic pressures, such as illegal hunting, may strongly affect their occupancy in Amazonia. We combined camera traps and occupancy models to assess the influence of distance from human settlements, the number of families per settlement and the synergetic effect of the average weight of 27 species on the occupancy probability of mammals. Specifically, we classified mammal species according to the game preferences of hunters (i.e. a group of species depleted for bushmeat, a group of species hunted for retaliation and a group of non‐hunted species). We also accounted for the influence on the detection probability of each group of both the number of days each camera operated and the body weight of mammals. The occupancy probability of the bushmeat group (i.e. deer, peccaries, agoutis, pacas and armadillos) was lower at locations closer to human settlements. Still, the number of families correlated positively with occupancy, with the occupancy probability of the group being slightly higher at sites with more families. This difference was probably due to larger and more abundant crops and fruiting trees attracting wildlife at such sites. Conversely, the occupancy probability of the retaliation group (i.e. carnivores) and the non‐hunted group (i.e. opossums, spiny rats, squirrels and anteaters) were indifferent to anthropogenic stressors. The detection probability of the non‐hunted and particularly the most depleted species correlated negatively with body weight. This may suggest that larger species, especially those from the bushmeat group, are rarer or less abundant in the system, possibly because they are the preferable target of hunters. In the long term, locals will likely need to travel long distances to find harvest meat. Poaching also threatens food security since game bushmeat is an essential source of protein for isolated rural Amazonians.

Funder

Idea Wild

Rufford Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference93 articles.

1. Manioc losses by terrestrial vertebrates in western Brazilian Amazonia

2. Determinants of Distribution of Large Mammals in Seti River Basin, Tanahun District of Western Nepal

3. Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente ‐ SEMA. Plano de Gestão da Reserva de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Puranga Conquista;Amazonas;Manaus,2022

4. Anacleto T. C. S. Miranda F. Medri I. Cuellar E. Abba A. M.  &Superina M.(2014).Priodontes maximus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2014 e.T18144A47442343.https://doi.org/10.2305/iucn.uk.20141.rlts.t18144a47442343.en

5. AIC Model Selection in Overdispersed Capture-Recapture Data

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3