Assessing herpes zoster vaccine efficacy in patients with diabetes: A community‐based cohort study

Author:

Kornelius Edy12ORCID,Lo Shih‐Chang2,Huang Chien‐Ning123,Wang Chi‐Chih14,Wang Yu‐Hsun5,Yang Yi‐Sun12

Affiliation:

1. School of Medicine Chung Shan Medical University Taichung Taiwan

2. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism Chung Shan Medical University Hospital Taichung Taiwan

3. Institute of Medicine Chung Shan Medical University Taichung Taiwan

4. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Chung Shan Medical University Hospital Taichung Taiwan

5. Department of Medical Research Chung Shan Medical University Hospital Taichung Taiwan

Abstract

AbstractThe effectiveness of herpes zoster (HZ) vaccines in patients with diabetes over the age of 50 remains an active area of research. Utilizing a real‐world database from the US community, this study spanning from 2006 to 2023, aimed to evaluate the impact of HZ vaccination on newly diagnosed diabetes patients who received an HZ vaccination within 1 year of diagnosis. Exclusion criteria were established to omit patients with immune deficiencies. The cohort consisted of 53 885 patients, with an average age of 63.5 years, including 43% females and 58% whites. After implementing 1:1 propensity score matching for age, sex, race, comorbidities, diabetes medication, and hemoglobin A1c to ensure comparability, the study population was further stratified into four groups: N1 comparing any HZ vaccination to non‐HZ vaccination (53 882 matched pairs), N2 for Shingrix versus non‐HZ vaccination (16 665 matched pairs), N3 for Zostavax versus non‐HZ vaccination (12 058 matched pairs), and N4 for Shingrix versus Zostavax (11 721 matched pairs). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed a hazard ratio (HR) for HZ incidence post any HZ vaccination of 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83–1.01). Additional analyses yielded HRs of 1.12 (95% CI: 0.93–1.34) for Shingrix versus non‐HZ vaccine, 1.02 (95% CI: 0.86–1.20) for Zostavax versus non‐HZ vaccine, and 1.06 (95% CI: 0.87–1.29) for Shingrix versus Zostavax. Subgroup analyses across age, sex, and follow‐up duration also showed no significant differences. These findings underscore the lack of a significant benefit from HZ vaccination in newly diagnosed diabetes patients aged over 50, highlighting the necessity for further prospective research.

Funder

Chung Shan Medical University Hospital

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3