Minutes matter: Time it takes to perform point‐of‐care ultrasound

Author:

Patrick David Peter1,Bradley Xenia Gia1,Wolek Caroline1,Anderson Bowen1,Grady James2,Herbst Meghan Kelly3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Connecticut School of Medicine Farmington Connecticut USA

2. Department of Public Health Sciences University of Connecticut School of Medicine Farmington Connecticut USA

3. Department of Emergency Medicine University of Connecticut School of Medicine Farmington Connecticut USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundWhile point‐of‐care ultrasound (PoCUS) is a safe, versatile tool that can improve patient care, the perceived time investment needed to incorporate PoCUS into clinical care is cited as a barrier to performance. We sought to determine the time it takes to perform a PoCUS examination and whether this time was influenced by training level and prior ultrasound experience.MethodsThis was a retrospective study looking at time stamps of all emergency medicine (EM) provider‐performed PoCUS examinations during clinical shifts from August 10, 2019, to June 7, 2022, at a suburban academic emergency department that is the site for a 3‐year EM residency. Our workflow is order‐based; when PoCUS is ordered, that patient's information populates the ultrasound machine worklist. Selecting the patient's name from the worklist generates a time‐stamped patient information page (PIP). We defined the PIP time stamp as the start of the PoCUS examination. The duration of one PoCUS examination was defined as the time of the last image acquired minus the time of the PIP. General estimating equations were used to estimate differences between training level and between prior scan status using an exchangeable correlation and Tukey adjusted pairwise comparisons. A two‐tailed chi‐square analysis was used for comparing accuracy according to training level.ResultsOf 4187 PoCUS examinations abstracted, 2144 met study criteria. The median (IQR) time spent per examination was 6.0 (3–9) min. First‐year residents took the longest to perform PoCUS among all providers (p < 0.0001). Residents with fewer than 250 prior scans took longer than residents with 501–800 (p = 0.0002) and >800 (p = 0.0013). Resident accuracy was not significantly different according to training level.ConclusionsOverall median time to perform PoCUS was 6.0 min. EM residents became more efficient in performing PoCUS as they advanced from first‐ to third‐year, without compromising accuracy.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Emergency Nursing,Education,Emergency Medicine

Reference22 articles.

1. Improving emergency department flow: reducing turnaround time for emergent CT scans;Perotte R;AMIA Annu Symp Proc,2018

2. Emergency Department Crowding Is Associated With Poor Care for Patients With Severe Pain

3. Point-of-Care Ultrasonography

4. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS): unnecessary gadgetry or evidence-based medicine?

5. AnsteyJ ConnerS O'BrienM LalaniF Prosch JensenT.The POCUS supervision safety gap: attending physician knowledge in point‐of‐care‐ultrasound lags behind that of internal medicine residents. Abstract presented at Hospital Medicine 2019 March 24–27 National Harbor MD.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3