The more things change the more they stay the same: Factors influencing emergency medicine residency selection in the virtual era

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundInterviews for emergency medicine (EM) residency positions largely transitioned to a virtual‐only format in 2020–2021. The impact of virtual interview factors on applicants’ rank of programs is unknown.ObjectiveWe sought to assess the impact of modifiable factors in virtual interviews on applicants’ rank of EM residency programs.MethodsWe conducted a cross‐sectional mixed‐methods survey of students applying to at least one of seven study authors’ EM residency programs in the United States during the 2020–2021 application cycle. The survey was developed using an interactive Delphi process and piloted prior to implementation. The survey was administered from May to June 2021 with up to four email reminders. Quantitative analysis included descriptive statistics. Three authors performed a thematic qualitative analysis of free‐text responses.ResultsA total of 664 of 2281 (29.1%) students completed the survey, including 335 (50.5%) male, 316 (47.7%) female, and six (0.9%) nonbinary. A total of 143 (21.6%) respondents identified as underrepresented in medicine and 84 (12.7%) identified as LGBTQIA+. Respondents participated in a median of 14 interviews and ranked a median of 14 programs. Most respondents (335, 50.6%) preferred a choice of in‐person or virtual, while 183 (27.6%) preferred all in‐person, and 144 (21.8%) preferred all virtual. The program website and interview social were the most important factors influencing respondent ranking. Qualitative analysis revealed several positive aspects of virtual interviews including logistical ease and comfort. Negative aspects include technical issues, perceived interview hoarding, and barriers to applicant assessment and performance. Demonstrated effort by the program, effective information delivery, communication of resident culture, and a well‐implemented interview day positively influenced respondents’ rank of programs.ConclusionsThis study identified characteristics of the virtual interview format that impact applicants’ rank of programs. These results can inform future recruitment practices.