Making decisions “in the dark”: Learning through uncertainty in clinical practice during Covid‐19

Author:

Vaid Urvashi1,Lundgren Henriette2,Watkins Karen E.3,Ziring Deborah4,Alcid Grace A.5,Marsick Victoria J.6,Papanagnou Dimitrios7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

2. Human Resource Development, Department of Organization and Leadership Teachers College at Columbia University New York New York USA

3. Department of Lifelong Education, Administration, and Policy University of Georgia Athens Georgia USA

4. Department of Medicine Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

5. Adult Learning and Leadership Program, Department of Organization and Leadership Teachers College at Columbia University New York New York USA

6. Department of Organization and Leadership Teachers College at Columbia University New York New York USA

7. Department of Emergency Medicine Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

Abstract

AbstractPurposeThe purpose of this study was to explore how decision making and informal and incidental learning (IIL) emerged in the clinical learning environment (CLE) during the height of the Covid‐19 pandemic. The authors’ specific interest was to better understand the IIL that took place among frontline physicians who had to navigate a CLE replete with uncertainty and complexity with the future goal of creating experiences for medical students that would simulate IIL and use uncertainty as a catalyst for learning.MethodUsing a modified constructivist, grounded theory approach, we describe physicians’ IIL while working during times of heightened uncertainty. Using the critical incident technique, we conducted 45‐min virtual interviews with seven emergency department (ED) and five intensive care unit (ICU) physicians, who worked during the height of the pandemic. The authors transcribed and restoried each interview before applying inductive, comparative analysis to identify patterns, assertions, and organizing themes.ResultsFindings showed that the burden of decision making for physicians was influenced by the physical, emotional, relational, and situational context of the CLE. The themes that emerged for decision making and IIL were interdependent. Prominent among the patterns for decision making were ways to simplify the problem by applying prior knowledge, using pattern recognition, and cross‐checking with team members. Patterns for IIL emerged through trial and error, which included thoughtful experimentation, consulting alternative sources of information, accumulating knowledge, and “poking at the periphery” of clinical practice.ConclusionsComplexity and uncertainty are rife in clinical practice and this study made visible decision‐making patterns and IIL approaches that can be built into formal curricula. Making implicit uncertainty explicit by recognizing it, naming it, and practicing navigating it may better prepare learners for the uncertainty posed by the clinical practice environment.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Emergency Nursing,Education,Emergency Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3