Constructed rock riffles increase habitat heterogeneity but not biodiversity in streams constrained by urban impacts

Abstract

AbstractRiffles are heterogeneous habitats that support diverse assemblages in natural streams. They are often constructed as part of stream restoration practice, including in degraded urban stream ecosystems, despite larger scale limits to ecological state. Such restoration practices fail to consider ecological theory, and their outcomes have rarely been robustly monitored and assessed. We assessed the effects of constructed rock riffles on habitat heterogeneity and on macroinvertebrate assemblages in six urban streams (4%–32% effective imperviousness). We compared habitat heterogeneity, and taxon abundance and richness of the six streams before and after (1 and 5 years) riffle construction and in three control streams without riffles. Riffles increased habitat heterogeneity. In contrast, macroinvertebrate assemblages in all streams were dominated by tolerant, cosmopolitan, and invasive taxa before and after riffle construction. Riffles reduced the abundance and richness of tolerant taxa in less urbanized streams and increased their richness in more urban streams. These changes had no effect on measures of biodiversity. Urban stormwater runoff can affect the degree to which rock riffles increase habitat heterogeneity through sediment transport and increased physical disturbance. In highly urban streams, increased habitat heterogeneity is likely to primarily favor cosmopolitan species that can tolerate frequent chemical and physical disturbance. Riffle construction may reduce the abundance of cosmopolitan species and increase the abundance of more sensitive species, but only if catchment‐scale impacts of urban stormwater runoff are adequately controlled. Robust experiments such as this add to general understanding of the effectiveness of restoration practice, reducing the need for ubiquitous monitoring of restoration projects.