The Use of Diffusion Tensor Imaging in the Identification of Acute Rejection and Chronic Allograft Nephropathy After Renal Transplantation

Author:

Jiang Bin1,Yu Yixing1,Wan Jiayi1,Xu Rui1,Ma Jiali1,Tian Yangyang2,Hu Linkun2,Wu Peng3,Hu Chunhong1ORCID,Zhu Mo1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Suzhou China

2. Department of Urology The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Suzhou China

3. Philips Healthcare Shanghai China

Abstract

BackgroundIdentifying the cause of renal allograft dysfunction is important for the clinical management of kidney transplant recipients.PurposeTo evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) for identifying allografts with acute rejection (AR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN).Study TypeProspective.SubjectsSeventy‐seven renal transplant patients (aged 42.5 ± 9.5 years), including 29 patients with well‐functioning stable allografts (Control group), 25 patients diagnosed with acute rejection (AR group), and 23 patients diagnosed with chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN group).Field Strength/Sequence1.5 T/T2‐weighted imaging and DTI.AssessmentThe serum creatinine, proteinuria, pathologic results, and fractional anisotropy (FA) values were obtained and compared among the three groups.Statistical TestOne‐way analysis of variance; correlation analysis; independent‐sample t‐test; intraclass correlation coefficients and receiver operating characteristic curves. Statistical significance was set to a P‐value <0.05.ResultsThe AR and CAN groups presented with significantly elevated serum creatinine as compared with the Control group (191.8 ± 181.0 and 163.1 ± 115.8 μmol/L vs. 82.3 ± 20.9 μmol/L). FA decreased in AR group (cortical/medullary: 0.13 ± 0.02/0.31 ± 0.07) and CAN group (cortical/medullary: 0.11 ± 0.02/0.27 ± 0.06), compared with the Control group (cortical/medullary: 0.15 ± 0.02/0.35 ± 0.05). Cortical FA in the AR group was higher than in the CAN group. The area under the curve (AUC) for identifying AR from normal allografts was 0.756 and 0.744 by cortical FA and medullary FA, respectively. The AUC of cortical FA and medullary FA for differentiating CAN from normal allografts was 0.907 and 0.830, respectively. The AUC of cortical FA and medullary FA for distinguishing AR and CAN from normal allografts was 0.828 and 0.785, respectively. Cortical FA was able to distinguish between AR and CAN with an AUC of 0.728.Data ConclusionDTI was able to detect patients with dysfunctional allografts. Cortical FA can further distinguish between AR and CAN.Evidence Level2Technical EfficacyStage 2

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3