Insurance Status and Access to Otolaryngology Care: National Mystery Caller Study in the United States

Author:

Corbisiero Michaele Francesco1ORCID,Muffly Tyler M.2ORCID,Gottman Drew C.1ORCID,Olson Madeline1,Hachicha Yasmine3,Garcia‐Creighton Elizabeth1,Gallego Natalie4,Elsayed Maryam3,Ahmed Sophia5,Cabrera‐Muffly Cristina6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Colorado School of Medicine Aurora Colorado USA

2. Denver Health Hospital and Authority Denver Colorado USA

3. New York University, School of Public Health New York New York USA

4. Columbia University New York New York USA

5. Villanova University, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences Villanova Pennsylvania USA

6. University of Colorado Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Aurora Colorado USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo investigate potential differences in new patient appointment wait times for otolaryngology care based on insurance types and explore factors influencing these wait times.Study DesignA cross‐sectional audit study, using a “mystery caller” approach, analyzed with a linear mixed Poisson model to adjust for confounding factors.SettingA total of 612 physicians across 49 states and the District of Columbia, representing 6 otolaryngology subspecialties, were included.MethodsOtolaryngology physicians were contacted by mystery callers via telephone with scripted clinical vignettes as patients with either Medicaid or Blue Cross/Blue Shield (BCBS) insurance. Callers requested next available appointment. Wait times for new patient appointments were recorded and analyzed in R using a generalized linear mixed Poisson model.ResultsA total of 1183 of 1224 calls reached a representative. Medicaid patients waited 5.73% longer (P < .001) compared to BCBS patients (IRR: 1.06; confidence interval [CI]: 1.03‐1.09; P < .001), with respective mean wait times of 36.8 days (SE ± 1.6) and 32.4 days (SE ± 1.6). Longer waiting times were also associated with physicians affiliated with universities (P = .001) and certain subspecialties, such as pediatric otolaryngology (P < .001) and neurotology (P = .008). Regional differences were also observed, with specific AAO‐HNS regions showing shorter wait times. The model achieved a conditional R‐squared value of 0.947.ConclusionThis study reveals disparities in wait times for otolaryngology care based on insurance type, with extended wait times for Medicaid beneficiaries. The findings highlight a potential access to care disparity, which begets the need for strategies that ensure equitable access to otolaryngology care and further research to understand the underlying reasons for these potential disparities.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference35 articles.

1. HealthCare.Gov.Federal Poverty Level (FPL) ‐ Glossary; 2023. Accessed May 30 2023. https://www.healthcare.gov/glossary/federal-poverty-level-fpl/

2. Medicaid Expansion: The Unfinished Promise of the Affordable Care Act

3. Medicaid patients have greater difficulty scheduling health care appointments compared with private insurance patients: a meta‐analysis;Hsiang WR;Inquiry,2019

4. Wait times, patient satisfaction scores, and the perception of care;Bleustein C;Am J Manag Care,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3