Affiliation:
1. Department of Epidemiology School of Public Health, University of São Paulo São Paulo Brazil
2. Center for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS) Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation Bahia Salvador Brazil
3. Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine London UK
4. Maternal Adolescent Reproductive & Child Health (MARCH) Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine London UK
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveTo estimate the prevalence and risk of stillbirths by biologic vulnerability phenotypes in a cohort of pregnant women in the municipality of São Paulo, Brazil, 2017–2019.MethodsRetrospective population‐based cohort study. Fetuses were assessed as small for gestational age (SGA), large for gestational age (LGA), adequate for gestational age (AGA), preterm (PT) as less than 37 weeks of gestation, non‐PT (NPT) as 37 weeks of gestation or more, low birth weight (LBW) as less than 2500 g, and non‐LBW (NLBW) as 2500 g or more. Relative risks (RR) with robust variance were estimated using Poisson regression.ResultsIn all 442 782 pregnancies, including 2321 (0.5%) stillbirths, were included. About 85% (n= 1983) of stillbirths had at least one characteristic of vulnerability, compared with 21% (n= 92524) of live births. Fetuses with all three markers of vulnerability had the highest adjusted RR of stillbirth—SGA + LBW + PT (RR 155.00; 95% confidence interval [CI] 136.29–176.30) and LGA + LBW + PT (RR 262.04; 95% CI 206.10–333.16) when compared with AGA + NLBW + NPT.ConclusionOur findings show that the simultaneous presence of prematurity, low birth weight, and abnormal intrauterine growth presented a higher risk of stillbirths. To accelerate progress towards reducing preventable stillbirths, one must identify the circumstances of greatest biologic vulnerability.
Funder
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Wellcome Trust
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology,General Medicine
Reference46 articles.
1. Global, regional, and national estimates and trends in stillbirths from 2000 to 2019: a systematic assessment
2. UNICEF.A neglected tragedy: the global burden of stillbirths. [Unicef data].2020. Accessed July 6 2022.https://data.unicef.org/resources/a‐neglected‐tragedy‐stillbirth‐estimates‐report/
3. BRASIL.Ministério da Saúde. DATASUS (Departamento de Informática do SUS). Accessed May 10 2023.http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/
4. Mortalidade perinatal no Brasil em 2018: análise epidemiológica segundo a classificação de Wiggleworth modificada
5. The Lancet Small Vulnerable Newborn Series: science for a healthy start
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Editorial: Selected papers from the XXIV FIGO World Congress;International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics;2024-03-26