Affiliation:
1. Department of General Surgery Ministry of Health Osmaniye State Hospital Osmaniye Turkey
2. Department of General Surgery Çukurova University Faculty of Medicine Adana Turkey
3. Department of Nuclear Medicine Çukurova University Faculty of Medicine Adana Turkey
4. Department of Biostatistics Çukurova University Faculty of Medicine Adana Turkey
Abstract
AbstractIntroductionThe aim of our study is to determine the value of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (TIRADS) scoring in predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules by examining its relationship with fine needle aspiration biopsy and postoperative histopathological results.Materials and MethodsIn this study, patients who underwent surgery after ultrasonographic examination and fine needle aspiration biopsy for thyroid nodules at the General Surgery Clinic of Çukurova University Faculty of Medicine between January 2014 and November 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The thyroid ultrasonography and fine needle aspiration biopsy of the included patients were performed by a clinician with 15 years of experience. The ultrasonographic features of the nodules were re‐evaluated by the same clinician, and the American College of Radiology (ACR) TIRADS score was determined. Fine needle aspiration biopsy results were grouped according to Bethesda criteria. Postoperative histopathological examination results were divided into two groups: benign and malignant. The ACR TIRADS score was compared with fine needle aspiration biopsy and histopathological results. The performance of the ACR TIRADS score in predicting malignancy was determined.Results79.8% of the 397 patients were female, and the mean age was 50.9 ± 12.8 years. The mean diameter of the nodules was 27.4 ± 15.8 mm. There was a significant, positive, but weak correlation between ACR TIRADS and Bethesda (p < 0.001) (r = 0.33). When the ACR TIRADS score was compared with histopathological results, it was found that the rate of malignancy increased as the TIRADS score increased (p < 0.001). The rates of malignancy diagnosis were 0% for TR1, 13.2% for TR2, 21.7% for TR3, 50.3% for TR4, and 72.4% for TR5. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for TIRADS in predicting malignancy was 0.747 (95% CI: 0.699–0.796, p < 0.001). TIRADS can distinguish malignancy with 75% accuracy. The optimal cutoff point was determined as TR4 with 80.3% sensitivity and 60.8% specificity.ConclusionThe ACR TIRADS scoring system is an effective risk classification system for thyroid nodules, providing 75% accuracy in predicting malignancy, with 80.3% sensitivity and 60.8% specificity values.