Adverse events related to accessory devices used during ureteroscopy: Findings from a 10‐year analysis of the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database

Author:

Juliebø‐Jones Patrick123ORCID,Somani Bhaskar K.4ORCID,Mykoniatis Ioannis35,Hameed B. M. Zeeshan36,Tzelves Lazaros37ORCID,Æsøy Mathias S.1,Gjengstø Peder1,Moen Christian Arvei1,Beisland Christian12,Ulvik Øyvind12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology Haukeland University Hospital Bergen Norway

2. Department of Clinical Medicine University of Bergen Bergen Norway

3. EAU YAU Urolithiasis Group Arnhem Netherlands

4. Department of Urology University Hospital Southampton Southampton UK

5. School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Faculty of Health Sciences Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Thessaloniki Greece

6. Department of Urology Father Muller Medical College Mangalore Karnataka India

7. Second Department of Urology National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sismanogleio General Hospital Athens Greece

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesThe objective of this study was to evaluate adverse events and device events related to accessories used during ureteroscopy (URS).Materials and methodsAnalysis was performed of the records available in the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database in the United States. Information was collected on characteristics of problem, timing, manufacturer verdict, successful completion of planned surgery, prolonged anaesthesia and injury to patient or staff.ResultsFive‐hundred seventy‐one events related to URS accessories were recorded. These were associated with the following devices: baskets (n = 347), access sheath (n = 86), guidewires (n = 78), balloon dilators (n = 27), ARDs (n = 17) and ureteral catheters (n = 16). Of the events, 12.7% resulted in patient injuries. Forty‐eight per cent of the events resulted in prolonged anaesthesia, but the planned surgery was successfully completed in 78.4% of all cases. Collectively, the manufacturers accepted responsibility due to actual device failure in only 0.5% of cases. Common problems for baskets were failure to deploy (39.5%) and complete detachment of basket head (34.6%) and partial breakage of the basket head (12.4%). Of the basket group, 4.3% required open or percutaneous surgery to remove stuck basket. Full break of the body of the access sheath occurred in 41.9% and complete ureteral avulsion in 3.5%. For balloon dilators, there was a burst in 37% of cases. Broken guidewires were associated with 11.5% requiring repeat intervention for retrieval and 6.4% required JJ stent due to perforation to the collecting system. No injuries to operating staff were recorded with accessory usage.ConclusionAccessories used during URS are fragile. Potential for serious injury does exist as a direct result of their use. Surgeons should familiarise themselves with these events and how they can be prevented.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3