Affiliation:
1. ESB Business School Reutlingen University Reutlingen Germany
2. Andrássy University Budapest Hungary
3. Bamberg University Bamberg Germany
Abstract
AbstractThrough their procyclical behavior, loan loss provisions have been determined as one of the factors that contribute to financial instability during a crisis. IFRS 9 was introduced in 2018 with an expected credit loss model replacing the incurred loss model of IAS 39 to mitigate the effect in the future. Our study aims to analyze loan loss provisions of major banks in the Eurozone to determine for the first time if the implementation of IFRS 9, as intended by regulators, has a dampening effect on procyclicality, especially during the stressed situation under COVID‐19. We analyze 51 banks from 12 countries of the European Monetary Union using 2856 firm‐year observations. While no robust evidence of less procyclicality can be found after the implementation of IFRS 9 until the pandemic, we find evidence that loan loss provisions moved countercyclical during 2020, indicating an alleviating effect at the beginning of the exogenous shock.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Accounting
Reference39 articles.
1. Credit Booms and Lending Standards: Evidence from the Subprime Mortgage Market
2. Bank for International Settlements. (2021).The procyclicality of loan loss provisions: A literature review. Working Paper 39. Retrieved fromhttps://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/wp39.pdf
3. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2020 April 03).Basel Committee sets out additional measures to alleviate the impact of Covid‐19. Retrieved fromhttps://www.bis.org/press/p200403.htm
4. Do delays in expected loss recognition affect banks' willingness to lend?