Comparison of triple-site ventricular pacing versus conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with systolic heart failure: A meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparison of triple-site ventricular pacing versus conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with systolic heart failure: A meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies

Published:2017-12-21 Issue:1 Volume:34 Page:55-64
ISSN:1880-4276
Container-title:Journal of Arrhythmia
language:en
Short-container-title:J Arrhythmia

Author:

Zhang Baowei¹,Guo Junfang¹,Zhang Guohui¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology; The affiliated People's Hospital of Jiangsu University; Zhenjiang China

Funder

Zhenjiang City Society Development Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference27 articles.

1. Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure;Abraham;N Engl J Med,2002

2. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC;McMurray;Eur Heart J,2012

3. Clinical and echocardiographic predictors of nonresponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy;Shanks;Am Heart J,2011

4. Triple-site pacing in patients with biventricular device-incidence of the phenomenon and cardiac resynchronization benefit;Bulava;J Interv Card Electrophysiol,2004

5. Effect of triangle ventricular pacing on haemodynamics and dyssynchrony in patients with advanced heart failure: a comparison study with conventional bi-ventricular pacing therapy;Yoshida;Eur Heart J,2007

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Pacemaker‐mediated tachycardia in a dual‐lead CRT‐D: What is the mechanism?;Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology;2020-11-08

2. MultiPoint-Pacing – mehr CRT oder Batterieverschwendung?;Herz;2018-09-12

3. Clinical outcome of left ventricular multipoint pacing versus conventional biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Heart Failure Reviews;2018-09-12