Bereaved parent preferences on quality end‐of‐life care for children with cancer in the South

Author:

Martinez Isaac1ORCID,Currie Erin2,Davis Elizabeth S.3,Kumar Rohail4,Lawhon Valerie5,Snaman Jennifer M.678ORCID,Tefera Raba B.1,Bhatia Smita19ORCID,Rosenberg Abby R.678ORCID,Johnston Emily E.19

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship Heersink School of Medicine University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USA

2. School of Nursing University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USA

3. Department of Surgery Boston University Boston Massachusetts USA

4. Division of Pediatric Palliative Medicine Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario and Roger Neilson House Ottawa Ontario Canada

5. Division of Hematology/Oncology Department of Medicine University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USA

6. Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA

7. Department of Pediatrics Boston Children’s Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA

8. Department of Pediatrics Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

9. Pediatric Hematology/Oncology University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine Birmingham Alabama USA

Abstract

AbstractPurposeThe authors sought to understand bereaved family preferences for end‐of‐life (EOL) care, particularly among Black families and those in the South.MethodsSemi‐structured interviews were conducted with parents of children who died of cancer ≥6 months before at Children’s of Alabama. Themes were identified via content analysis. Quotes related to medical intensity, chemotherapy, and location of death (LOD) were scored on 5‐point Likert scales, ranging from 1 (comfort care, chemotherapy, or home death) to 5 (medically intense care, avoidance of chemotherapy, or hospital death).ResultsTwenty‐seven bereaved parents (12 Black) were interviewed. Children died at a mean of 13.1 years (SD = 6.1 years) and a median of 3 years before the interview (range = 1–12 years). Ten children (42%) had central nervous system tumors and the majority (63%) died in the hospital. Family decision‐making involved maintaining hope, not causing harm, doing what was best for their child and themselves, and religious beliefs. There was no clear preference for home versus hospital death (3.0 [1.8–4.0]). Instead, parents considered their child’s desires and/or medical needs, siblings, and prior experiences with death. To have a comfortable death, parents highlighted the need for comprehensive education about their child’s EOL, a caring and comfortable environment, and 24/7 access to their care team. Families expressed a dual preference for comfort care (1.8 [1.3–2.8]) and chemotherapy (3.5 [2.7–4.1]) at EOL.ConclusionsFamilies did not see chemotherapy and comfort care as conflicting goals. They sought quality care emphasizing flexibility, quality time with their child, and open access to their care team, regardless of LOD.

Funder

Kaul Pediatric Research Institute

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3