Barrett's paradox of cooperation in the case of quasi‐linear utilities

Author:

Accinelli Elvio1ORCID,Afsar Atefeh2ORCID,Martins Filipe3ORCID,Martins José45ORCID,Oliveira Bruno M.P.M.46ORCID,Oviedo Jorge7ORCID,Pinto Alberto A.48,Quintas Luis7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Facultad de Economía Universidad Autónoma de San Luís Potosí San Luis Potosi México

2. Mathematics Department Allen University Columbia South Carolina USA

3. Centro de Matemática Universidade do Porto Porto Portugal

4. LIAAD–INESC TEC Porto Portugal

5. School of Technology and Management Polytechnic of Leiria Leiria Portugal

6. Faculdade de Ciências da Nutrição e Alimentação Universidade do Porto Porto Portugal

7. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada San Luis (UNSL‐CONICET) Universidad Nacional de San Luis San Luis Argentina

8. Department of Mathematics University of Porto Porto Portugal

Abstract

This paper fits in the theory of international agreements by studying the success of stable coalitions of agents seeking the preservation of a public good. Extending Baliga and Maskin, we consider a model of homogeneous agents with quasi‐linear utilities of the form , where is the aggregate contribution and the exponent is the elasticity of the gross utility. When the value of the elasticity increases in its natural range , we prove the following five main results in the formation of stable coalitions: (i) the gap of cooperation, characterized as the ratio of the welfare of the grand coalition to the welfare of the competitive singleton coalition grows to infinity, which we interpret as a measure of the urge or need to save the public good; (ii) the size of stable coalitions increases from 1 up to ; (iii) the ratio of the welfare of stable coalitions to the welfare of the competitive singleton coalition grows to infinity; (iv) the ratio of the welfare of stable coalitions to the welfare of the grand coalition “decreases” (a lot), up to when the number of members of the stable coalition is approximately and after that it “increases” (a lot); and (v) the growth of stable coalitions occurs with a much greater loss of the coalition members when compared with free‐riders. Result (v) has two major drawbacks: (a) A priori, it is difficult to “convince” agents to be members of the stable coalition and (b) together with results (i) and (iv), it explains and leads to the “pessimistic” Barrett's paradox of cooperation, even in a case not much considered in the literature: The ratio of the welfare of the stable coalitions against the welfare of the grand coalition is small, even in the extreme case where there are few (or a single) free‐riders and the gap of cooperation is large. “Optimistically,” result (iii) shows that stable coalitions do much better than the competitive singleton coalition. Furthermore, result (ii) proves that the paradox of cooperation is resolved for larger values of so that the grand coalition is stabilized.

Funder

Asociación Universitaria Iberoamericana de Postgrado

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3