Transparency as an empty signifier? Assessing transparency in EU and platform initiatives on online political advertising and actors

Author:

Meyer Trisha12ORCID,Vetulani‐Cęgiel Agnieszka3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussels Belgium

2. United Nations University‐CRIS Brugge Belgium

3. Adam Mickiewicz University Poznań Poland

Abstract

AbstractThis paper investigates how the European Union (EU) and online platforms operationalise ‘political advertising’ and ‘transparency’ in a context of ongoing political and policy debates on regulating online platforms. We compare ongoing EU policy initiatives (revised Code of Practice on Disinformation and Regulation on the Transparency and Targeting of Political Advertising) against platform policies and practices (Google, Mastodon, Meta, Microsoft, Telegram, TikTok, Twitter/X) undertaken to moderate political actors and advertising. We argue that the concept of transparency is used as an ‘empty signifier’: meaningful at the political and declarative level but when translated into practice, leads to diverse results. The paper contributes to academic and policy debates on platform responsibility and political advertising transparency in light of the recent European elections and the future implementation of the Regulation on the Transparency and Targeting of Political Advertising.

Funder

Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

Connecting Europe Facility

Publisher

Wiley

Reference41 articles.

1. Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability

2. Lobbying and the responsible firm: Agenda-setting for a freshly conceptualized field

3. Corporate lobbying in the European Union: the logic of access

4. Bradshaw S. Baily H. &Howard P. N.(2021).Industrialized disinformation. 2020 Global inventory of organized social media manipulation. Retrieved March 12 2024 fromhttps://demtech.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/posts/industrialized-disinformation/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3