Heparin versus 0.9% sodium chloride locking for prevention of occlusion in central venous catheters in adults-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Heparin versus 0.9% sodium chloride locking for prevention of occlusion in central venous catheters in adults

Published:2018-07-30 Issue:7 Volume:2018 Page:
ISSN:1465-1858
Container-title:Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

López-Briz Eduardo¹,Ruiz Garcia Vicente²,Cabello Juan B³,Bort-Martí Sylvia⁴,Carbonell Sanchis Rafael⁵,Burls Amanda⁶

Affiliation:

1. La Fe University Hospital; Department of Pharmacy & CASP Spain; Avda Fernando Abril Martorell 106 Valencia Valencia Spain 46026

2. La Fe University Hospital; Hospital at Home Unit & CASPe Spain; Av Fernando Abril Martorell nº 106 Valencia Spain 46026

3. Hospital General Universitario de Alicante; Department of Cardiology & CASP Spain; Pintor Baeza 12 Alicante Alicante Spain 03010

4. HIPRA; Avda de la Selva 135 Amer, Girona Spain 17170

5. Sagunt Hospital; ENT Department; Ramón y Cajal 46 Sagunt Valencia Spain 46520

6. City University London; School of Health Sciences; Myddleton Street London UK EC1V 0HB

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pharmacology (medical)

Link

https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD008462.pub3/epdf/full

Reference239 articles.

1. Beigi AK HadiZadeh MS Salimi F Ghaheri H Heparin compared with normal saline to maintain patency of permanent double lumen hemodialysis catheters: a randomized controlled trial Advanced Biomedical Research 2014 121 10.4103/2277-9175.133192

2. Comparison of occlusion rates by flushing solutions for peripherally inserted central catheters with positive pressure Luer-activated devices;Bowers;Journal of Infusion Nursing,2008

3. Normal saline versus heparin solution to lock totally implanted venous access devices: results from a multicenter randomized trial;Dal Molin;European Journal of Oncology Nursing,2015

4. Heparin versus normal saline as locking solution in totally implantable venous ports: a randomized controlled trial in cancer patients;Goossens;Supportive Care in Cancer,2013

5. Comparing normal saline versus diluted heparin to lock non-valved totally implantable venous access devices in cancer patients: a randomised, non-inferiority, open trial;Goossens;Annals of Oncology,2013

Cited by 56 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Implementation contexts and strategies for alternative peripherally inserted central catheter material and design selection: A qualitative exploration using CFIR/ERIC approach;Journal of Advanced Nursing;2024-07-24

2. Medical Device-Associated Biofilm Infections and Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens;Pathogens;2024-05-08

3. A Study on the Effect of Lidocaine-Assisted Non-Coring Needle Placement Using Painless Encircling Puncture in Children with Totally Implantable Venous Access Device;Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare;2024-05

4. Patency, assessment, and management of central catheter occlusion in adult patients in the intensive care unit: a best practice implementation project;JBI Evidence Implementation;2024-04-26

5. Central venous access device terminologies, complications, and reason for removal in oncology: a scoping review;BMC Cancer;2024-04-19