The development of rating scales to evaluate experiential prosthetic foot preference for people with lower limb amputation

Author:

Ruxin Talia R.1ORCID,Halsne Elizabeth G.12ORCID,Hafner Brian J.2ORCID,Shofer Jane1,Hansen Andrew H.34,Childers W. Lee56,Caputo Joshua M.7,Morgenroth David C.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. VA RR&D Center for Limb Loss and Mobility (CLiMB) VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Washington USA

2. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine University of Washington Seattle Washington USA

3. Minneapolis Adaptive Design & Engineering (MADE) Program Minneapolis VA Health Care System Minneapolis Minnesota USA

4. Departments of Rehabilitation Medicine & Biomedical Engineering University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA

5. Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence Houston Texas USA

6. Center for the Intrepid, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Brooke Army Medical Center Houston Texas USA

7. Human Motion Technologies LLC (Humotech) Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundSelection of a foot is an important aspect of prosthetic prescription and vital to maximizing mobility and functional goals after lower limb amputation. Development of a standardized approach to soliciting user experiential preferences is needed to improve evaluation and comparison of prosthetic feet.ObjectiveTo develop rating scales to assess prosthetic foot preference and to evaluate use of these scales in people with transtibial amputation after trialing different prosthetic feet.DesignParticipant‐blinded, repeated measures crossover trial.SettingVeterans Affairs and Department of Defense Medical Centers, laboratory setting.ParticipantsSeventy‐two male prosthesis users with unilateral transtibial amputation started, and 68 participants completed this study.InterventionsParticipants trialed three mobility‐level appropriate commercial prosthetic feet briefly in the laboratory.Main Outcome Measures“Activity‐specific” rating scales were developed to assess participants' ability with a given prosthetic foot to perform typical mobility activities (eg, walking at different speeds, on inclines, and stairs) and “global” scales to rate overall perceived energy required to walk, satisfaction, and willingness to regularly use the prosthetic foot. Foot preference was determined by comparing the rating scale scores, after laboratory testing.ResultsThe greatest within‐participant differences in scores among feet were observed in the “incline” activity, where 57% ± 6% of participants reported 2+ point differences. There was a significant association (p < .05) between all “activity‐specific” rating scores (except standing) and each “global” rating score.ConclusionsThe standardized rating scales developed in this study could be used to assess prosthetic foot preference in both the research and clinical settings to guide prosthetic foot prescription for people with lower limb amputation capable of a range of mobility levels.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Neurology,Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3